|
Related Topics:
| OK, next question :-) - Since I seem to have stumped everyone with the thing, lets try this.... The AP switch is on the throttle quadrant which is a popup panel. Is there any way to move that switch to the main panel?
Question? - Will Silver Wings by Bill Lyons affect the way Active Sky 6 looks and acts? Mr. Steve
Question about HDs - Anyone up are Hard Drives? I have an older SCSI in my other computer that is not even I had problems with it from the very very slow etc. I think the people who built it for me, didn't know much about them. There were..
Odd question - I know that this is not the right group for my Q, shoot me. I need my mic for and he is not working. After a test I found that the mic is oke but the sound card is not On my mainboard is a onboard sound facility but I do not..
XML Question - I want to create a bomb bay door switch for a b-52. I have a little with the editor in FSPS. My Exit Door Command is the letter instead of the When I manually press the the cockpit door opens and closes properly. When I..
|
|
|
Next: Flight-Sim: OEM Drum Mics - Chinese Drum Mics Manufacturer
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 01, 2007 Posts: 122
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:15 am
Post subject: Question re tubeliners Archived from groups: alt>games>microsoft>flight-sim (more info?)
|
|
|
I have been flying and enjoying the Wilco 737-300 lately. In its default
condition the banking angle for turns is set at 30 Degrees. I wonder if
that is realistic, it seems rather steep in the turn and would in reality be
uncomfortable for any passengers. I generally try to set it at 15 degrees
which is more leisurely imho, however when ATC tell me to turn on this
setting , they bitch at me constantly that I should expedite the turn. It
can go even lower to 10 deg I believe but the turnong circle then is massive
and I have had ATC cancel my FP when I tried that and took too long.
So the question is, what is realistic?
--
Canuck (CYXX)
49°03'39.63"N 122°16'21.82"W >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 234
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Canuck
My PMDG 747-400X manuals state the following:
Bank Limit Selector:
Allows the crew to manually set a bank limit on the aircraft, or allow
the AFDS and FMC to calculate and determine the bank angle limits
based on aircraft configuration and performance factors.
AUTO limits AFDS commanded Bank Angle to 15-25 degrees, depending of
TAS, flap position and aircraft weight. (Bank angle will decrease
from 25 to 15 degrees at speeds between 332 and 381 knots)
If LNAV mode is engaged, bank angle will be limited to 15 degrees when
speed is below V2+90 knots and flaps are up, or an engine fails when
flaps are not up, or TAS is greater than 381 knots.
Bank angle is limited to 8 degrees when below 200 feet AGL (to limit
engine strike)
If knob is set to any setting other than auto then the AFDS bank angle
will be limited to that number of degrees regardless of airspeed and
aircraft configuration. I read somewhere esle recommendations
regarding passenger comfort but can't find them at the moment as the
manuals are huge.
Hope this helps
Ibby >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 321
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Apr 24, 9:51 am, Ibby <ibb....DeleteThis@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
. I read somewhere esle recommendations
> regarding passenger comfort but can't find them at the moment as the
> manuals are huge.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Ibby
FWIW, during my past two recent flights, our 737-700 made some
extremely steep banks (must have been 30 degrees), and as much as I
tried, I couldn't feel a thing physically. It was exciting visually,
since I was looking straight down at the ground or up into space,
depending which way Capt. Hotshot was turning. On saying that, I
might also say that I was disappointed I didn't feel some sensation,
because it looks so damn dramatic from the ground.
When I'm flying the sim, I set my banks to 30 degrees. I don't want
to use up miles and miles turning because I'm afraid a passengers
might spill his nuts.
Arthur
(Toronto) >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 29, 2007 Posts: 393
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Canuck" <someone.DeleteThis@shaw.com> wrote in message
news:75ZPj.88157$rd2.37663@pd7urf3no...
>I have been flying and enjoying the Wilco 737-300 lately. In its default
>condition the banking angle for turns is set at 30 Degrees. I wonder if
>that is realistic, it seems rather steep in the turn and would in reality
>be uncomfortable for any passengers. I generally try to set it at 15
>degrees which is more leisurely imho, however when ATC tell me to turn on
>this setting , they bitch at me constantly that I should expedite the turn.
>It can go even lower to 10 deg I believe but the turnong circle then is
>massive and I have had ATC cancel my FP when I tried that and took too
>long.
> So the question is, what is realistic?
I understood that 20 degrees is regarded as a "standard turn". I could be
wrong of course.
--
Iain
Rugby, UK >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 23, 2008 Posts: 17
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Iain Smith" <iainsmithdotrugbyatbtinternetdotcom> wrote in message
news:_LadnTKpPbtA943VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Canuck" <someone DeleteThis @shaw.com> wrote in message
> news:75ZPj.88157$rd2.37663@pd7urf3no...
>>I have been flying and enjoying the Wilco 737-300 lately. In its default
>>condition the banking angle for turns is set at 30 Degrees. I wonder if
>>that is realistic, it seems rather steep in the turn and would in reality
>>be uncomfortable for any passengers. I generally try to set it at 15
>>degrees which is more leisurely imho, however when ATC tell me to turn on
>>this setting , they bitch at me constantly that I should expedite the
>>turn. It can go even lower to 10 deg I believe but the turnong circle then
>>is massive and I have had ATC cancel my FP when I tried that and took too
>>long.
>> So the question is, what is realistic?
>
> I understood that 20 degrees is regarded as a "standard turn". I could be
> wrong of course.
>
> --
> Iain
> Rugby, UK
>
A standard turn is also known as a two minute turn ie it takes two minutes
to turn 360 deg. I can't find my flight manuals and my memory is fading fast
but I'm pretty sure that it was 30 deg bank.
cheers >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 24, 2008 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>> I understood that 20 degrees is regarded as a "standard turn". I could be
>> wrong of course.
>
>A standard turn is also known as a two minute turn ie it takes two minutes
>to turn 360 deg. I can't find my flight manuals and my memory is fading fast
>but I'm pretty sure that it was 30 deg bank.
>
>cheers
Someone asked in a payware support forum I follow where the turn
indicator was in their boeing, here are the most helpful couple of
answers.
> Jets are a different animal. Because rate-of-turn is a function of speed and
> bank angle, the large variations in speed in a jet make a turn coordinator
> somewhat useless. In modern jets the flight director does the math for you
> and commands the necessary bank angle. But back in the day we taught a
> basic formula that should work for you.
>
> KTAS /10 + 5 = Bank Angle
>
> Just use KIAS + 10 to approximate KTAS.
>
> So..@ 200 KIAS you need about 26* bank to be standard rate.
>
>Clear as mud?
and (basically the same thing worded a bit differently)
> Bank Angle for standard rate turns
> 2. If indicated airspeed is in knots, divide airspeed by 10 and add 50%
> of that value. Eg.IAS is 100kts divided by 10 equals 10 plus 5 (50% of 10)
> equals 15 degrees (100/10=10+5 (50% of 10) =15 degrees)bank angle
> for a standard rate turn.
Hope that helps
Gary in Auckland >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 01, 2007 Posts: 122
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thank you all for the input, I guess 30 is OK then, I just didn't want those
virtual passengers sliding around in their virtual seats and spilling their
virtual djinn-un-tonix.
--
Canuck (CYXX)
49°03'39.63"N 122°16'21.82"W
"SnakeEyes" <agalspector.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:24684c09-5add-489d-8d19-6f5f5994fdc1@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 24, 9:51 am, Ibby <ibb....RemoveThis@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
.. I read somewhere esle recommendations
> regarding passenger comfort but can't find them at the moment as the
> manuals are huge.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Ibby
FWIW, during my past two recent flights, our 737-700 made some
extremely steep banks (must have been 30 degrees), and as much as I
tried, I couldn't feel a thing physically. It was exciting visually,
since I was looking straight down at the ground or up into space,
depending which way Capt. Hotshot was turning. On saying that, I
might also say that I was disappointed I didn't feel some sensation,
because it looks so damn dramatic from the ground.
When I'm flying the sim, I set my banks to 30 degrees. I don't want
to use up miles and miles turning because I'm afraid a passengers
might spill his nuts.
Arthur
(Toronto) >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 27, 2008 Posts: 59
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Question re tubeliners [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Canuck skrev:
> I have been flying and enjoying the Wilco 737-300 lately. In its default
> condition the banking angle for turns is set at 30 Degrees. I wonder if
> that is realistic, it seems rather steep in the turn and would in reality be
> uncomfortable for any passengers. I generally try to set it at 15 degrees
> which is more leisurely imho, however when ATC tell me to turn on this
> setting , they bitch at me constantly that I should expedite the turn. It
> can go even lower to 10 deg I believe but the turnong circle then is massive
> and I have had ATC cancel my FP when I tried that and took too long.
> So the question is, what is realistic?
>
After a few supersonic flights, I've learned that if the turn radius is getting
to big, slow down.
The faster you fly, the steeper you can bank, without the passengers noticing,
except those who actually uses their windows to look at stuff outside, just make
sure, the G-meter is between 0,8 and 1,8, and not moving to fast between the two.
Tommy C, Denmark >> Stay informed about: Question re tubeliners |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|