orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc..

mm not sure it buggy yet . i havnt played it that much i dont think. maybe
i will just get it and not install for now maybe. patches i do put in after
every expansion. so far i have sim2 , uni, nl and ofb only.
"Jeanie" <Nobody RemoveThis @home.com> wrote in message
news:5PzSh.15214$Rg2.8497@trndny02...
>
> "orange" <mamx RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:nwzSh.21634$PV3.224540@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> should i get it for 10 bucks. i dont know if it still in the store. it is
>> used though. in a game store. mmm not sure what to do. 10 buck is still
>> lot of monies . i cant make my mind up on my own nope. i havd to let it
>> percolate a bit in the brain a bit mmmm what to do ! mmm.happy easter to
>> all. orange
> Well, it sounds like you are sorely tempted. I would not be. At all.
> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
> required patches. Just think about that for a minute. Is your game buggy
> enough for you now? If not, get FunStuff. <g>
>
> Jeanie
>
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
> required patches.

But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't see how
this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

"Homer J. Simpson" <root.RemoveThis@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:YoWdne9oWOWpOIbbnZ2dnUVZ_sGqnZ2d@magma.ca...
>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
>> required patches.
>
> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't see how
> this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
>

Oh don't tell me YOU bought those stuffy packs too???? I would have never
thought it from your postings.

deene
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

Homer J. Simpson wrote:
>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
>> required patches.
>
> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't
> see how this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.

My point is that if "stuff" needs to be patched, it isn't just "stuff."
It's changing game files somewhere.

Jeanie
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

>>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
>>> required patches.
>>
>> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't
>> see how this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
>
> My point is that if "stuff" needs to be patched, it isn't just "stuff."
> It's changing game files somewhere.

Call me pedantic, but *my* point is that even if that's the case, since the
patches exist, why is that bad?
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

>>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
>>> required patches.
>>
>> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't see
>> how this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
>
> Oh don't tell me YOU bought those stuffy packs too???? I would have never
> thought it from your postings.

Good Lord, where does it suggest in my post that I bought any of them???

Believe me, I'm vehemently opposed to these packs--I've never bought them,
and never will. In fact I blame those who *do* buy them for the reduced
number of objects found in new expansion packs nowadays. Those people
proved to EA/Maxis that there's a market for them, so they have less of an
incentive to put more goodies in the expansion packs. I've mentioned this
before in this group.

I was merely pointing out that Jeanie's argument was moot. Don't read
something that isn't there.
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

Homer J. Simpson wrote:

> I was merely pointing out that Jeanie's argument was moot. Don't read

I'm not sure Jeanie's argument was moot. Afterall, when's the last time
a maxis patch did what it was supposed to do?

Etta
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

>> I was merely pointing out that Jeanie's argument was moot. Don't read
>
> I'm not sure Jeanie's argument was moot. Afterall, when's the last time a
> maxis patch did what it was supposed to do?

....which is why I specifically added 'unless they don't fix anything'.
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

Homer J. Simpson wrote:
>>>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs
>>>> that required patches.
>>>
>>> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't
>>> see how this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
>>
>> My point is that if "stuff" needs to be patched, it isn't just
>> "stuff." It's changing game files somewhere.
>
> Call me pedantic, but *my* point is that even if that's the case,
> since the patches exist, why is that bad?

Matter of perspective, I guess. I don't want objects to change my game
files. I wouldn't download something that did that and I certainly wouldn't
pay for it.

Jeanie
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

>>> My point is that if "stuff" needs to be patched, it isn't just
>>> "stuff." It's changing game files somewhere.
>>
>> Call me pedantic, but *my* point is that even if that's the case,
>> since the patches exist, why is that bad?
>
> Matter of perspective, I guess. I don't want objects to change my game
> files. I wouldn't download something that did that and I certainly
> wouldn't pay for it.

Good point. I generally don't trust third-party downloads myself for that
very reason.
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

are patches no good at all?
they come with expansion and get put on the computer though for the previous
game . oh well. more stuff to take room on our poor computers.
"orange" <mamx DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nwzSh.21634$PV3.224540@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> should i get it for 10 bucks. i dont know if it still in the store. it is
> used though. in a game store. mmm not sure what to do. 10 buck is still
> lot of monies . i cant make my mind up on my own nope. i havd to let it
> percolate a bit in the brain a bit mmmm what to do ! mmm.happy easter to
> all. orange
>
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

"Homer J. Simpson" <root.DeleteThis@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:VLadnZ4lj7ile4bbnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@magma.ca...
>>>> Remember that FunStuff and GlamourStuff were both "stuff" packs that
>>>> required patches.
>>>
>>> But the patches exist...so unless they don't fix anything, I don't see
>>> how this would be a valid argument against the stuff packs.
>>
>> Oh don't tell me YOU bought those stuffy packs too???? I would have never
>> thought it from your postings.
>
> Good Lord, where does it suggest in my post that I bought any of them???
>
> Believe me, I'm vehemently opposed to these packs--I've never bought them,
> and never will. In fact I blame those who *do* buy them for the reduced
> number of objects found in new expansion packs nowadays. Those people
> proved to EA/Maxis that there's a market for them, so they have less of an
> incentive to put more goodies in the expansion packs. I've mentioned this
> before in this group.
>
> I was merely pointing out that Jeanie's argument was moot. Don't read
> something that isn't there.
>

Well, good!! And I agree with every word! I just wanted to hear you say it
again. )

deene
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc.. 

Homer J. Simpson wrote:
>>>> My point is that if "stuff" needs to be patched, it isn't just
>>>> "stuff." It's changing game files somewhere.
>>>
>>> Call me pedantic, but *my* point is that even if that's the case,
>>> since the patches exist, why is that bad?
>>
>> Matter of perspective, I guess. I don't want objects to change my
>> game files. I wouldn't download something that did that and I
>> certainly wouldn't pay for it.
>
> Good point. I generally don't trust third-party downloads myself for
> that very reason.

Well, I'm a little leery of the ones from some sites, but trust others
because my experience has been good. Also, downloading objects from a
forum-type format (like at dinnerbell, MTS2, Insim, and places like that)
means that I can read through the thread and see if others have had good
experiences with it. Usually, if I trust the creator, I don't worry about
it.

Jeanie
 >> Stay informed about: orange oooooooooi saw a sim2 fun stuff for sale for 10 buc..