Oh, this message is useless now.

External Since: Jul 19, 2005 Posts: 443

"Pixel \"#~" <jjwweerrff.TakeThisOut@phil.uu.nl> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:

>>>>> You sure do ask a lot of questions, don't you?
>>>>
>>>> Well, yes, but financial transparency for the donaters isn't really
>>>> too much to ask, is it?
>>>
>>>No, but you're asking me before the process is complete.
>>>
>>>As it stands at the moment, I have paid AU$199 for the hosting, which is
>>>reduced to AU$169 after I get the commission back for being a referrer. The
>>>Paypal account currently holds US$55.49 (they've taken nearly $5 in fees),
>>>which I'm expecting to convert to about AU$75, but you never can tell with
>>>Paypal.
>>
>>Well, it's not really that big a deal. As long as I get my stock
>>options.
>
> I donated now. I think. It's not an almighty big amount, but I am not
> very well proportioned in the money business of life.

I know that all too well. And you even have a job!

Close, but no donut, cops!

--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ---------------------------------------
He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized
there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there
wasn't an afterlife.
-- Douglas Adams
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --

External Since: Jul 19, 2005 Posts: 443

Sean <sgegg RemoveThis @hotspammeallyouwantpop.com> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:

>>>>>>>>>>>Chuckle
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It's genuine of course. Have I ever lied to any of you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Prove it! Show the old lady's license or something!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>She had it suspended. That's why she's selling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I assume you would be able to show a copy of the contract with
>>>>>>>her...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I would... if I hadn't left it in my other pants.
>>>>>
>>>>>They always have...
>>>>>
>>>>>*sighs*
>>>>>
>>>>>I guess we'll just have to accept that this is a non-genuine genuine
>>>>>thread...
>>>>
>>>>But look at this certificate of authenticity! Ignore the fact that
>>>>it's stuck on with masking tape, that's because it... uh... fell
>>>>off, and I had to reattach it.
>>>
>>>Is that authentic masking tape?
>> Of course - it has the holographic watermark and everything.
>
> That's a pretty dodgy holographic watermark. How much use has this
> tape seen?

How much *genuine* use, that is!

--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ---------------------------------------
UNIX is user-friendly;
it's just particular about who it chooses to be friends with!
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --