What graphics are you running with UT3

8800GTX and it is smooth as silk.

messa



"Bruno" <dont.use DeleteThis @this.address.ever> wrote in message
news:472f859f$0$7607$157c6196@dreader2.cybercity.dk...
> GTD wrote:
>> Bruno wrote:
>>> GTD wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The 2600 is WAY below the x1950s (not much above the x850) with no AA
>>>> or AF, and even worse WITH AA and AF, to a point of being below the
>>>> x850. Even the x2900 scored lower than the x1950 when AA and AF get
>>>> turned up.
>>>> It's weird how the new cards don't seem to hold their own in a few
>>>> ways. They do well at lower resolutions though. . .
>>>>
>>>> http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=859&...el2=722
>>> It sounds like they are suffering from slow memory. Memory performance
>>> is a major factor when using higher resolution and also a factor when it
>>> comes to AA.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Bruno
>> It's listed as having faster memory IIRC, ,
>
> Hmm - the graph I linked to show the 2600 at 1100 Mhz and the 1950's at
> 1350-1950 Mhz depending on model.
>
> Kind regards
> Bruno
>
 >> Stay informed about: What graphics are you running with UT3