X2 disappointing..

On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:28:53 -0700, Bret Ripley <ripley RemoveThis @olywa.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:01:11 +0100, br d wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:39:21 GMT, "FLY135" <FLY_135(@hot not
>> not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bret Ripley" <ripley RemoveThis @olywa.net> wrote in message
>>>news:xpmreq57nmpm.17kquovrif7gp$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:00:06 GMT, FLY135@hot not not wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > "Lemming" <thiswillbounce RemoveThis @bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> > news:rc1ok0h0rp3mje09gk3mspu2ebfsgan8ml@4ax.com...
>>>> >> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:23:50 +1000, Little TeaPot
>>>> >> <Scully RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Yeah that TAra can SPAM like a bitch can't she
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Why do you persist in top-posting? Is it to better demonstrate your
>>>> >> single-figure IQ?
>>>> >
>>>> > Probably because he can. The same reason you guys insist on posting
>>>inane
>>>> > comments that have little or no relationship to the thread topic.
>>>>
>>>> </irony>
>>>
>>>You're one post too late.
>>
>> That's just Bret's style.
>
>It's my own particular idiom. It makes each conversational exchange a
>reflective couplet, and each thread a circumspect sonnet.
>
><cough>

</cough>

Lemming
--
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.

Allan Parent wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:28:53 -0700, Bret Ripley <ripley.TakeThisOut@olywa.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:01:11 +0100, br d wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:39:21 GMT, "FLY135" <FLY_135(@hot not
>>>not)notmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Bret Ripley" <ripley.TakeThisOut@olywa.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:xpmreq57nmpm.17kquovrif7gp$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:00:06 GMT, FLY135@hot not not wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Lemming" <thiswillbounce.TakeThisOut@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:rc1ok0h0rp3mje09gk3mspu2ebfsgan8ml@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:23:50 +1000, Little TeaPot
>>>>>>><Scully.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yeah that TAra can SPAM like a bitch can't she
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why do you persist in top-posting? Is it to better demonstrate your
>>>>>>>single-figure IQ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Probably because he can. The same reason you guys insist on posting
>>>>
>>>>inane
>>>>
>>>>>>comments that have little or no relationship to the thread topic.
>>>>>
>>>>></irony>
>>>>
>>>>You're one post too late.
>>>
>>>That's just Bret's style.
>>
>>It's my own particular idiom. It makes each conversational exchange a
>>reflective couplet, and each thread a circumspect sonnet.
>>
>><cough>
>>
>>Bret
>
>
> I love it when Bret talks dirty.

If you knew Bret like I know Bret, you'd know that Bret is anything but
dirty.

He is so clean he squeaks (squeaks not squeels). An hour of shower will
do that.

Cleanest man I know.
>
> Allan
>

Don "Who in comparision to Bret is filthy"