In article <UrwDg.3399$Z1.127@trnddc03>, JohnHwangCSI.TakeThisOut@cs.com.no.com
says...
> Myrmidon wrote:
> > I'd be willing to bet most people would be rather
> > pissed off to put a lot of time, effort, and materials into making a
> > nice piece of terrain only to discover it was of very limited or no use
> > due to being to cramped inside.
>
> I'd be willing to bet most people would make a "test" building before
> making an entire city, adjusting things as necessary with each new
> building added.
>
> > I'm quite certain that John knows better than this, he just
> > doesn't like being called on his comments.
>
> I don't like it when I'm getting "called on" a perfectly valid opinion
> when the whole thing is subjective in the first place.
>
>
Not as subjective as you think, the guy asked his question based on
playability, your answer was geared toward the modelers view. If you had
started your post with something like "From a modelers perspective..."
or in some other way pointed out that you prefer the asthetics of the
way scenery looks more then how useful it is. You might have recieved a
whole lot less flak.
I have seen it happen several times where you jump on to an answer with
a view that has little or nothing to do with the question. Then get
indgnant, and start talking down to people when they call you on it.
It's one of the reasons that I skim most of your posts rather then
reading them all the way through, and if I am pressed for time, I just
mark your posts read and skip them completely.
--
Jim M
In the grim darkness of the present, there is only September...
>> Stay informed about: [40K] Vertical Scale for Buildings??