Vic,
Looks like a good system. The only issue I would have is the graphics
card... I know that FSX (and FS9) is always going to be CPU limited,
but, for the good processor you are getting the GPU isn't really
matched; performance wise.
If you are buying the machine 'off-the-shelf' then I would ask how much
an upgrade to either a Radeon X1900+ or NVidia 7600GT at the least.
Even better would be a the higher end X1950 or 7900GT+ cards.
Forgetting about FS for the moment (gasps in horror!

), any machine
that will be used for high performance computing such as gami.. err
simulations need to be designed to be performance matched. Having a
Core-2 E6800 extreme paired to 512MB RAM and a X1300 is really a waste
(unless you are just interested in specific number crunching tasks).
Likewise, having a 8800GTX paired to a Celeron (or some such) is again
not going to give you top performance.
Cheers...
AndyR
Uncle Vic wrote:
> I finally handed my old machine down and bought something state of the art.
> I'm running FS9 happily at 60+ FPS with the sliders maxed, but I wonder
> what I am missing by avoiding FSX. I guess my main question would be if
> this machine's rendering of FSX will be a slide show like my old one was
> with FS9. Here's the machine:
>
> ASUS STI motherboard
> Intel Core-2 duo E6400 @ 2.13 gHz
> 2 gigs memory DDR2
> 250 GB Hard drive (SATA-300)
> Radeon X1600 pro video card (256 MB onboard)
> Soundblaster Audigy ZS2 Platinum sound card
> (I nicked that from another machine)
>
>
>
> --
> Uncle Vic
>
> Don't be afraid. The lack of a deity is not an opening for chaos. It is a
> call for responsibility. -Lauren Becker >> Stay informed about: System for FSX?