"Brett I. Holcomb" <brettholcomb.DeleteThis@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:pm0l049bh8hnpmomooigjcaplkj072g7cv@4ax.com...
> Thanks. That helps.
>
I use UTX. The thing I find it does is it makes your city... look a little
more like a city. Commercial, industrial sections. Adds the surrounding
towns and cities that FSX forgot. In fact FSX forgot 1/2 of my city. UTX
replaced that of course.
More roads and accurate. Nice interchanges. A slideshow of sorts is
here...
http://66.135.39.111/ultterrain/UtxUsaDemo.swf
home page is here...
http://www.scenerysolutions.com/
A good product for sure.
--
dave
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:03:10 -0500, "scott s." <75270_3703a.DeleteThis@csi.xcom>
> wrote:
>
>>Brett I. Holcomb <brettholcomb.DeleteThis@bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>news:tdii04d1elvfrg313jeaern38m7c50ifaq@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Some posts here recommended Ultimate Terrain X and it sure looks nice.
>>> As I've been looking at what's available I also notice there is a
>>> Ground Environment X and Flight Environment X. Any comments on these
>>> and how they interact or work with UTX?
>>
>>Both UTX and GEX are regional products, and I use the US versions.
>>I find them both very nice and complementary. GEX is a "textures"
>>addon, while UTX is mainly "placement" (though it has some textures
>>as well). GEX actually provides some replacements for the UTX
>>textures, where they would conflict (which mainly means color
>>match) with the GEX textures.
>>
>>I don't have FEX, so can't comment on this.
>>
>>UTX has a nice control utility, which has some capabilities
>>that "power tweakers" can use if desired. UTX repositions
>>a lot of default objects, which was a problem in FS9.
>>
>>scott s.
>>. >> Stay informed about: Scenery Add-ons FSX 
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
