Rick Kunkel <NOSPAM-kunkel.DeleteThis@w-link.net> sent:
> More generally, I guess this is a double-strike versus Regeneration
> thing, but this is the specific example that came up.
Rockshard Elemental {5}{R}{R} Creature - Elemental 4/3
/ Double strike
/ Morph {4}{R}{R}
Twisted Abomination {5}{B} Creature - Zombie Mutant 5/3
/ {B}: Regenerate Twisted Abomination.
/ Swampcycling {2}
> Is this right?
> - Rockshard Elemental (RE) attacks. Twisted Abomination (TA) blocks.
> - First strike damage is put on the stack.
> - TA throws up a regeneration shield.
> - First strike damage resolves.
> - TA's regeneration shield replaces TA's destruction, and removes TA
> from combat.
Good to here.
> - Combat is over. "Normal strike" damage isn't dealt with.
Not quite here. There's still one creature in combat, the Rockshard
Elemental. It has double strike, so it participates in the regular
combat damage step. There will also be the end of combat step after
that.
> The alternating viewpoint is was that the TA would have to regenerate
> a 2nd time. This was the minority viewpoint, but there was quite a
> bit of debate, so I promised to ask.
The regeneration takes it out of combat; it's no longer blocking the
Rockshard Elemental at this point. The Rockshard Elemental gets to
assigning regular combat damage, finds no blockers and assigns no
damage, but the step does still take place.
--
-- Zoe Stephenson, NetRep rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules
Group FAQ:
http://www.boondock.org.uk/~zoe/mtgrules/ --
--
>> Stay informed about: Rockshard Elemental vs. Twisted Abomination