| Author |
Message |
External

Since: May 13, 2004 Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:36 pm
Post subject: Photo or CG? Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>games>space-sim, others (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 31, 2004 Posts: 325
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
taragem72.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com (Tara) wrote in
news:61f7c3a1.0410272236.77c7c9a@posting.google.com:
> How well will you do?
7 out of 10
Gandalf Parker >> Stay informed about: Photo or CG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2004 Posts: 16
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 17, 2004 Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gandalf Parker wrote:
| taragem72.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com (Tara) wrote in
| news:61f7c3a1.0410272236.77c7c9a@posting.google.com:
|
|
|>How well will you do?
|
|
| 7 out of 10
Same here.
But it was a bit of a 'rigged' test in the sense that there were only (
well, almost ) inanimated objects. If they'd have faces or even just,
say, a photo of a cat you'd find it much easier.
- --
Leo Fellmann
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBhBpzwjjtrLvNMRARAmmfAKDI6MORumBm2dedYpqu6Rt8cGi1FQCdHOE+
mi8bXzyJjOwbThYvg54ExUA=
=RVkG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Stay informed about: Photo or CG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2004 Posts: 16
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Leo Fellmann" <l.fellmann.TakeThisOut@free.fr> wrote in message
news:2ucfajF2830r7U1@uni-berlin.de...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gandalf Parker wrote:
> | taragem72.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com (Tara) wrote in
> | news:61f7c3a1.0410272236.77c7c9a@posting.google.com:
> |
> |
> |>How well will you do?
> |
> |
> | 7 out of 10
>
> Same here.
> But it was a bit of a 'rigged' test in the sense that there were only (
> well, almost ) inanimated objects. If they'd have faces or even just,
> say, a photo of a cat you'd find it much easier.
It was also rigged in the sense that the photographs were either unnaturally
lit or PhotoShopped to look like CG. >> Stay informed about: Photo or CG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 04, 2004 Posts: 207
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 28 Oct 2004 14:51:00 GMT, Leo Fellmann <l.fellmann.RemoveThis@free.fr> wrote:
>But it was a bit of a 'rigged' test in the sense that there were only (
>well, almost ) inanimated objects. If they'd have faces or even just,
>say, a photo of a cat you'd find it much easier.
http://www.this-wonderful-life.com/
Lemming
--
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat. >> Stay informed about: Photo or CG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2004 Posts: 282
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 13, 2004 Posts: 451
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ceowulf" <ceo.DeleteThis@NOSPAMii.ATALLnet> wrote:
>"Tara" <taragem72.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:61f7c3a1.0410272236.77c7c9a@posting.google.com...
>> http://www.alias.com/eng/etc/fakeorfoto/
>>
>> How well will you do?
>
>9 outta 10... Ahhh the bloody nails!
Spoilers
I thought they were the easiest of the real ones. I didn't think someone
would pick up on the wrinkles in the metal so well.
The nose was the easiest fake one. There were no pores in the skin or
anything. Completely amateur.
The hardest was the wine glass.
I got 7/10 and then 4/4 for the bonus round. >> Stay informed about: Photo or CG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 31, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Photo or CG? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |