Welcome to GameHourz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Mixing periods

 
   Game Forums (Home) -> Historical War Games RSS
Related Topics:
TBC Fast Package(1-70) - Any Class Free 2000G - Wow per level per level. Dear Sir or Madam Hot Sale!For all of our news and are some Special Package! We now provide measured by..

Birth of America-First impressions - Well I the game last night and dove right in to try and get a feel for it. Overall my are good, however the game has an feel to it. Minor issues like text running outside the display box, or major concerns like..

Another request for games recommendations - Hi. I just checked the most recent posts, and I don't think my request quite matches any of the others. I haven't bought a game for years (except a Civ III which doesn't really rival Civ II IMO). I still play Civ II and sometimes TOAW, also..

BIRTH OF AMERICA: Steep System Requirements? - Game seems pretty cool, but it's on my laptop; the cursor lag is terrific, and it's boiling the Works OK on my gaming machine, but I couldn't find the system anywhere. -- Giftzwerg *** see. What..

Digital downloads done right? - Hi, Given all the recent threads about copy and digital this weekend I took a close look at how one publisher decided to do it. I bought and GalCiv 2 from Stardock. Let me add that I don't think any of..
Next:  Historical War Games: Theatre of War - new demo  
Author Message
eddysterckx

External


Since: May 13, 2005
Posts: 1292



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:02 am
Post subject: Mixing periods
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>games>war-historical (more info?)

Hi,

Playing around with Advanced Tactics, which is more like a general
purpose wargame engine than anything else I've come across in recent
times had me wondering again about mixed period warfare. Mixed periods
is what you often see in tabletop games where a Chinese army of 1000
BC fights Karolingian Franks or such using a ruleset that is general
enough for both armies.

Questions like : could 2500 English (ok, Welsh) longbowmen have
outfought 5000 Brown Bess equipped Napoleonic times infantry when put
against each other in a firefight on a battlefield ? (I say yes) And
could the quick moving phalanxes of Philips of Macedon overrun either
of them ? (tricky question)

I seem to remember a wargame where you could design armies and
scenarios for just about any period - rather generic - but how as it
called and did it allow you to set up fights between Gallic cavalry
against Napoleonic Cuirrassiers or any other silly stuff like that ?

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx

 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
MJB

External


Since: Dec 03, 2007
Posts: 191



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:29 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<eddysterckx.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:089effa0-f158-4b6e-93c1-31452b3ac750@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> Hi,
>
> Playing around with Advanced Tactics, which is more like a general
> purpose wargame engine than anything else I've come across in recent
> times had me wondering again about mixed period warfare. Mixed periods
> is what you often see in tabletop games where a Chinese army of 1000
> BC fights Karolingian Franks or such using a ruleset that is general
> enough for both armies.

In the world of miniature gaming cross-period compatibility is required for
purely practical reasons - mostly because a gamer has already bought and
painted an army led by someone with the appelation of 'the great' or 'the
conquerer'. And then you're hard-pressed to find another gamer who's
willing to build and paint an appropriate enemy army - typically led by
someone called 'the fat', 'the bald' or 'the unready'. I'm a case in
point - I built my Macedonian army almost thirty years ago and in a flurry
of enthuasim (and club bulk discounts) also bought Greeks, Indians and
Persians. To date I've painted some of the Greeks and not one of the
Persians or Indians.

>
> Questions like : could 2500 English (ok, Welsh) longbowmen have
> outfought 5000 Brown Bess equipped Napoleonic times infantry when put
> against each other in a firefight on a battlefield ? (I say yes) And
> could the quick moving phalanxes of Philips of Macedon overrun either
> of them ? (tricky question)

Ben Franklin once suggested that the Revolutionary armies of the nacent US
military turn in their muskets for longbows. I've never been certain of
exactly how serious his suggestion actually was. And the phalanxes were
extremely vulnerable to missile fire - the Roman legionarries were able to
exploit the disorder in the phalangist's ranks caused by their thrown pilum
to great effect during Rome's wars with the Selucid empire. So I'd guess it
would be a matter of ground too - a pike phalanx had to be deployed on
carefully scouted and relatively flat land to have any chance of
effectiveness.

>
> I seem to remember a wargame where you could design armies and
> scenarios for just about any period - rather generic - but how as it
> called and did it allow you to set up fights between Gallic cavalry
> against Napoleonic Cuirrassiers or any other silly stuff like that ?

Pre-gunpowder tactics (and particularly cavalry tactics) were pretty similar
across the millenia. Especially as the training manuals of the day were
oftentimes based on the training manuals of the previous eras.
Missile-armed cavalry on small horses skirmished and harassed. Armored
cavalry with heavier horses and better weapons charged. It didn't really
make a lot of difference in terms of effect whether the charging cavalry
were Byzantine cataphracts or crusader knights or Napoleonic cuirassiers.

<shrug>

It wasn't until the time of the American Civil War that infantrymen could
see a line of cavalry approach and say "here come those damn fools with
their sabres."

--
MJB

Mr. Tin's Miniature Painting Workshop:
http://web.newsguy.com/Mrtinsworkshop/

 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
eddysterckx

External


Since: May 13, 2005
Posts: 1292



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:51 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 8 feb, 15:29, "MJB" <mrt....TakeThisOut@OLDsguy.com> wrote:
>
> Ben Franklin once suggested that the Revolutionary armies of the nacent US
> military turn in their muskets for longbows.

It took a couple of years of training to shoot the longbow with the
speed and accuracy we associate it with - to learn how to shoot a
musket can be done while walking up to the battlefield so to speak.

> I've never been certain of
> exactly how serious his suggestion actually was.

Not serious at all probably Smile

> And the phalanxes were
> extremely vulnerable to missile fire

Really ?

>- the Roman legionarries were able to
> exploit the disorder in the phalangist's ranks caused by their thrown pilum
> to great effect during Rome's wars with the Selucid empire.

The pilum was designed to bend upon impact (soft iron) and to get
stuck into the shield, making it unwieldy and dragging it down. The
effect on a phalanx which kind of depended on interlocking shields
could have been devastating.

> So I'd guess it
> would be a matter of ground too - a pike phalanx had to be deployed on
> carefully scouted and relatively flat land to have any chance of
> effectiveness.

Agreed - battlefields were even prepared before combat, vegetation
removed and such.

> > I seem to remember a wargame where you could design armies and
> > scenarios for just about any period - rather generic - but how as it
> > called and did it allow you to set up fights between Gallic cavalry
> > against Napoleonic Cuirrassiers or any other silly stuff like that ?
>
> Pre-gunpowder tactics (and particularly cavalry tactics) were pretty similar
> across the millenia. Especially as the training manuals of the day were
> oftentimes based on the training manuals of the previous eras.
> Missile-armed cavalry on small horses skirmished and harassed. Armored
> cavalry with heavier horses and better weapons charged. It didn't really
> make a lot of difference in terms of effect whether the charging cavalry
> were Byzantine cataphracts or crusader knights or Napoleonic cuirassiers.
>
> <shrug>
>
> It wasn't until the time of the American Civil War that infantrymen could
> see a line of cavalry approach and say "here come those damn fools with
> their sabres."

There are a couple of examples of medieval battles where pikemen won
against heavy cavalry charging - Courtrai 1302 being one of them - a
couple battles in Scotland of which names and dates escape me right
now and the Swiss were also known for this.

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
von Schmidt

External


Since: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: 47



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:10 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> >- the Roman legionarries were able to
> > exploit the disorder in the phalangist's ranks caused by their thrown pilum
> > to great effect during Rome's wars with the Selucid empire.
>
> The pilum was designed to bend upon impact (soft iron) and to get
> stuck into the shield, making it unwieldy and dragging it down. The
> effect on a phalanx which kind of depended on interlocking shields
> could have been devastating.

I am going to nitpick here: the Macedonian and Selucid phalanx
consisted of pikemen (falangists) with very long 2 handed sarissa
pike, light (leather or linen) armour and no or very small (elbow)
shields. The main protection against missiles was the hope that those
would shatter against the angled forest of pikes.

You are thinking of the classical Greek (eg Spartan) hoplite
shieldwall, with 3 feet long round interlocking shields and the
hoplite warrior clad in all-body armour and using a one-handed
stabbing spear. This formation is also called the Phalanx but of quite
a different nature.

The pilum would have been pretty useful against either type but for
different reasons (either making shields useless or directly hitting
the falangist).
IIRC the Romans usuallly managed to break the Greek phalanxes by
engaging in difficult terrain and getting in close - taking casualties
in doing so - and then causing carnage with the vicious short gladius
sword.

Regards,

-von Schmidt
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Big Salad

External


Since: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 21



(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

eddysterckx.DeleteThis@hotmail.com wrote:

> There are a couple of examples of medieval battles where pikemen won
> against heavy cavalry charging - Courtrai 1302 being one of them - a
> couple battles in Scotland of which names and dates escape me right
> now and the Swiss were also known for this.

Stirling Bridge (1297) and Bannockburn (1314).
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Luca Morandini

External


Since: May 09, 2005
Posts: 20



(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

eddysterckx.RemoveThis@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 8 feb, 15:29, "MJB" <mrt....RemoveThis@OLDsguy.com> wrote:
>> Ben Franklin once suggested that the Revolutionary armies of the nacent US
>> military turn in their muskets for longbows.
>
> It took a couple of years of training to shoot the longbow with the
> speed and accuracy we associate it with

Two years at the very least: the skeletons of longbowmen are
recognizable by the bigger arm and shoulder bones (I suppose it was the
right side... hmm... but I'm left-handed hence I may be wrong),
something that was accomplished only by starting to train at a tender age.


> The pilum was designed to bend upon impact (soft iron) and to get
> stuck into the shield, making it unwieldy and dragging it down. The
> effect on a phalanx which kind of depended on interlocking shields
> could have been devastating.

I think you're mixing up two kind of phalanxes, actually... oh, wait,
Mr. von Schmidt already made this point Wink

Regards,

--------------------
Luca Morandini
www.lucamorandini.it
--------------------
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
eddysterckx

External


Since: May 13, 2005
Posts: 1292



(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:28 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 8 feb, 18:41, Luca Morandini <lmorand....DeleteThis@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> I think you're mixing up two kind of phalanxes, actually... oh, wait,
> Mr. von Schmidt already made this point Wink

Yup - I was - that is : I never even heard of the second type until
now Smile

Greetz

Eddy Sterckx
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
eddysterckx

External


Since: May 13, 2005
Posts: 1292



(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:25 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 9 feb, 15:13, Luca Morandini <lmorand....RemoveThis@ieee.org> wrote:
> eddyster....RemoveThis@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On 8 feb, 18:41, Luca Morandini <lmorand....RemoveThis@ieee.org> wrote:
> >> I think you're mixing up two kind of phalanxes, actually... oh, wait,
> >> Mr. von Schmidt already made this point Wink
>
> > Yup - I was - that is : I never even heard of the second type until
> > now Smile
>
> Doesn't this make you fell young ? Wink

You saw the second type in action back in your younger days ? Smile

Greetz,

Eddy Sterckx
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ray O'Hara

External


Since: Oct 21, 2007
Posts: 35



(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:29 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<eddysterckx DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fd6ed4b2-af8d-40db-a3ec-ea6c92b000bd@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 feb, 15:29, "MJB" <mrt... DeleteThis @OLDsguy.com> wrote:
> >
> > It wasn't until the time of the American Civil War that infantrymen
could
> > see a line of cavalry approach and say "here come those damn fools with
> > their sabres."
>
> There are a couple of examples of medieval battles where pikemen won
> against heavy cavalry charging - Courtrai 1302 being one of them - a
> couple battles in Scotland of which names and dates escape me right
> now and the Swiss were also known for this.
>
> Greetz,
>
> Eddy Sterckx


well ordered infantry will beat horse every time.
a horse will not charge into a formed body of troops.

the phalanx was created to defeat cavalry. the legion to defeat the phalanx.
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ray O'Hara

External


Since: Oct 21, 2007
Posts: 35



(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:33 am
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<eddysterckx DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef70a851-7440-4c39-9126-3f42bc9e444c@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 feb, 18:41, Luca Morandini <lmorand... DeleteThis @ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think you're mixing up two kind of phalanxes, actually... oh, wait,
> > Mr. von Schmidt already made this point Wink
>
> Yup - I was - that is : I never even heard of the second type until
> now Smile
>
> Greetz
>
> Eddy Sterckx

you've never heard of alexander the great?????
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Luca Morandini

External


Since: May 09, 2005
Posts: 20



(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Mixing periods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

eddysterckx DeleteThis @hotmail.com wrote:
> On 8 feb, 18:41, Luca Morandini <lmorand... DeleteThis @ieee.org> wrote:
>> I think you're mixing up two kind of phalanxes, actually... oh, wait,
>> Mr. von Schmidt already made this point Wink
>
> Yup - I was - that is : I never even heard of the second type until
> now Smile

Doesn't this make you fell young ? Wink

--------------------
Luca Morandini
www.lucamorandini.it
--------------------
 >> Stay informed about: Mixing periods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Game Forums (Home) -> Historical War Games All times are: Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]