|
Related Topics:
| Aye question... - Before using the damn card, I want to know if it's how I think it'll work... Aye Cardtype: Master Master: trifle. Put this card on a Laibon. This Laibon may tap this card to cancel a Frenzy card played on him or her as it is played. This Laibon may..
Yet another PTW question - AFAIK, the current rulings about PTW sound like this: * A player must try to achieve GW if he has chances to get it. * If the player has no chances to get GW, he must try to get the maximum number of VPs (i.e. 2VPs if he has..
NoR "Tags" Question - So out of what is the for the that most of the Imbued have in their names? Is on online tag that they use? Curious Tobin -tpl
[LSJ] last NoR preview and question - Hello, Here is the last preview : When an imbued has no life, he is placed in the region but not ready). Effects which are not usable by an ally being burned are not usable by an imbued being Any..
Play to Win question - Hello LSJ, Consider this scenario: It's midgame, and my only chance to get a GW is to pass a vote that my predator can block. Assume the vote will pass if it reaches I threaten my predator, "If you block the vote, I..
|
|
|
Next: Trading Cards Jyhad: Draft report: TempleCondemn the Sins of the Father
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:08 pm
Post subject: Masquer question [LSJ]
Archived from groups: rec>games>trading-cards>jyhad (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| Can a minion with a Masquer attempt to block a 1 stealth action, and
when the acting minion declares no more stealth, burn the Masquer to
give the minion previously with the Masquer, 1 intercept?
Vegas gNat
|
>> Stay informed about: Masquer question [LSJ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Feb 07, 2008
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:25 am
Post subject: Re: Masquer question [LSJ] [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Feb 7, 9:08 am, tigernat1 <tigern....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can a minion with a Masquer attempt to block a 1 stealth action, and
> when the acting minion declares no more stealth, burn the Masquer to
> give the minion previously with the Masquer, 1 intercept?
IANLSJ, but I'll give this a go. 
I would say no. Failure to increase stealth is acceptance of the
attempt to block, so there won't be any window in which to burn the
Masquer. Also, there is no minion you could legally give the intercept
to since except the minion with the Masquer (since it's illegal to
play intercept unless intercept is required, i.e. the minion is
attempting to block and needs more intercept).
Schiavo
Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 11, 2004
Posts: 300
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:34 am
Post subject: Re: Masquer question [LSJ] [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hodgestar wrote:
> On Feb 7, 9:08 am, tigernat1 <tigern....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can a minion with a Masquer attempt to block a 1 stealth action, and
>> when the acting minion declares no more stealth, burn the Masquer to
>> give the minion previously with the Masquer, 1 intercept?
>
> IANLSJ, but I'll give this a go.
>
> I would say no. Failure to increase stealth is acceptance of the
> attempt to block, so there won't be any window in which to burn the
> Masquer. Also, there is no minion you could legally give the intercept
> to since except the minion with the Masquer (since it's illegal to
> play intercept unless intercept is required, i.e. the minion is
> attempting to block and needs more intercept).
Correct. >> Stay informed about: Masquer question [LSJ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:48 am
Post subject: Re: Masquer question [LSJ] [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Feb 7, 3:34 am, LSJ <vtes... RemoveThis @white-wolf.com> wrote:
> Hodgestar wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 9:08 am, tigernat1 <tigern... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Can a minion with a Masquer attempt to block a 1 stealth action, and
> >> when the acting minion declares no more stealth, burn the Masquer to
> >> give the minion previously with the Masquer, 1 intercept?
>
> > IANLSJ, but I'll give this a go.
>
> > I would say no. Failure to increase stealth is acceptance of the
> > attempt to block, so there won't be any window in which to burn the
> > Masquer. Also, there is no minion you could legally give the intercept
> > to since except the minion with the Masquer (since it's illegal to
> > play intercept unless intercept is required, i.e. the minion is
> > attempting to block and needs more intercept).
>
> Correct.
(regarding the illegal to play intercept unless intercept is required
point above)
By burning the Masquer, I am not increasing intercept for the blocking
minion. The amount of intercept has stayed teh same. When the
Masquer is burned the minon's intercept is reduced to 0 but then
increased back to 1, by the effect of the Masquer.
Vegas gNat >> Stay informed about: Masquer question [LSJ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 11, 2004
Posts: 300
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Masquer question [LSJ] [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
tigernat1 wrote:
> On Feb 7, 3:34 am, LSJ <vtes....TakeThisOut@white-wolf.com> wrote:
>> Hodgestar wrote:
>>> On Feb 7, 9:08 am, tigernat1 <tigern....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Can a minion with a Masquer attempt to block a 1 stealth action, and
>>>> when the acting minion declares no more stealth, burn the Masquer to
>>>> give the minion previously with the Masquer, 1 intercept?
>>> IANLSJ, but I'll give this a go.
>>> I would say no. Failure to increase stealth is acceptance of the
>>> attempt to block, so there won't be any window in which to burn the
>>> Masquer. Also, there is no minion you could legally give the intercept
>>> to since except the minion with the Masquer (since it's illegal to
>>> play intercept unless intercept is required, i.e. the minion is
>>> attempting to block and needs more intercept).
>> Correct.
>
> (regarding the illegal to play intercept unless intercept is required
> point above)
>
> By burning the Masquer, I am not increasing intercept for the blocking
> minion. The amount of intercept has stayed teh same. When the
> Masquer is burned the minon's intercept is reduced to 0 but then
> increased back to 1, by the effect of the Masquer.
You're trying to equate "gain 1 and lose 1" with "no effect".
If you don't need intercept, you cannot burn the Masquer to gain intercept. >> Stay informed about: Masquer question [LSJ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
