Field of Strategy 2

old.salt.TakeThisOut@cmaaccess.com wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:53:12 -0800 (PST), "eddysterckx@hotmail.com"
> <eddysterckx.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a freeware wargame with a massive scope : all eras and tactical
>> to strategical play - worth a look
>
> Thanks for the heads up, D/Ling it now.

Any thoughts? The screenshots are absolutely bewildering in their ambition.

--
smr
 >> Stay informed about: Field of Strategy 2 

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:58:09 -0600, smr <me.TakeThisOut@shawnritchie.com> wrote:

>old.salt@cmaaccess.com wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:53:12 -0800 (PST), "eddysterckx@hotmail.com"
>> <eddysterckx.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's a freeware wargame with a massive scope : all eras and tactical
>>> to strategical play - worth a look
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up, D/Ling it now.
>
>Any thoughts? The screenshots are absolutely bewildering in their ambition.

I do like the Campaign aspect of the game where you go to the
tactical map to fight the battle. I have played it a few times, and
it does do what it says it does. But maybe I have been spoiled by CM
for grafix, and sound is used to let you know a unit fired. The AI is
lacking, but then they said that. But if you wish to play someone in
e-mail, you can fight any battle from any time period.
 >> Stay informed about: Field of Strategy 2