|
Related Topics:
| Crashes, Crashes and More Crashes to Desktop - I'm still having problems with crashes to desktop. I've tried a number of different solutions to no avail, so I have this question: I have a program called RealScene Terrain and Landclass 2004 installed which enhances the U.S. and Alaska. I also have..
Desktop Forum somewhere - I realize there is probably some other place out there to ask this but since it's FS related and there are so many experts here.... Suddenly I have no moving map. I open it and it shows in the task bar but I've searched every border around the edges..
Sound versus display? - On runway, with engine running, the trees nearby are When I cut the engine, the stops. So I assume there is a between sound and display. I have AMD Athlon 64 3000+, Radeon X300SE 128MB PCIE. Sound is RealTek..
Level of detail question - Hi all, Some time ago I remember reading about ways to set the level of detail shown in FS9 as the distance gets greater, i.e. the further away a mountain is, the lower the level of detail. Try as I may, I am unable to find that article again and..
cfs3 probs - I dont know if anyone can 'elp. OK so I modified my MkVIII mosquito so it goes 236mph cruise, fires torpedos & hvars at the same time, has the same power as a D520, but I get into a dogfight and it drops outta the sky when I bank, and wont..
|
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Feb 06, 2006 Posts: 77
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 11:13 am
Post subject: FS9 quits to desktop Archived from groups: alt>games>microsoft>flight-sim (more info?)
|
|
|
Have tried twice: taking off from Singapore Changi with a Airbus A 340 500,
toward Newark (yes, I'm trying the longest real flight in the world) and
about 10 minutes after take off, at the same point, FS9 quits to desktop
with no error messages: it just dies.
Have no sceneries in that area (Changi airport is default) except FSgenesis
and GE. Any clue?
Another question: according to Singapore Airlines, Singapore flight from
Changi to Newark takes about 18 hours. When planning the route with FSNav it
actually takes 18 hours as well, provided that I dont calculate any high
altitudes point (i.e. it takes 18 hours with a direct GPS flight), whereas
with a high altitudes calculated route it takes more than 21 hours: whats
wrong?
thanks to all
Quai >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 18, 2005 Posts: 873
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Quai wrote:
> Have tried twice: taking off from Singapore Changi with a Airbus A 340 500,
> toward Newark (yes, I'm trying the longest real flight in the world) and
> about 10 minutes after take off, at the same point, FS9 quits to desktop
> with no error messages: it just dies.
> Have no sceneries in that area (Changi airport is default) except FSgenesis
> and GE. Any clue?
I was having numerous occasions when my FS9 would crash to desktop, and
I learned through trial and error it was my video card causing the
problem. I upgraded the drivers and it seemed to help.
> Another question: according to Singapore Airlines, Singapore flight from
> Changi to Newark takes about 18 hours. When planning the route with FSNav it
> actually takes 18 hours as well, provided that I dont calculate any high
> altitudes point (i.e. it takes 18 hours with a direct GPS flight), whereas
> with a high altitudes calculated route it takes more than 21 hours: whats
> wrong?
>
GPS flights are direct - the shortest distance between the two
destinations even though the path may appear to loop with the curvature
of the earth. If you notice, the plane never makes any turns when
using the GPS direct navigation system.
When using the established high altitude flight paths, you must follow
routes which have been layed out according to waypoints for specific
purposes to accomodate geography and other traffic and may not be the
most direct (I will stand corrected if anyone knows more than I do
about the subject).
> thanks to all
>
> Quai
Was wondering, since I like to take long-distance flights myself:
What do you do during the flight? Do you save it and continue flying
when you can or do you accelerate it or do you just let the plane fly
on AP while you do other things?
I love using FSPassengers, and it won't allow me to save a flight and
come back to it. If I do an international flight, I don't use FSP and
fly empty which really isn't as much fun.
SnakeEyes >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 18, 2005 Posts: 873
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 8:48 pm
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Not4wood wrote:
> Crash to Desktop:
>
> There are several fixes. First one is the most applied. What version Of FS
> due you have??? Are you using FS9 and did up upgrade to FS9.1? This will
> correct a lot of CTD's.
>
> Also, when you are flying and it does ctd what are you doing at that moment?
> Are you looking at your kneeboard?? I remember that there is a file in AOL
> Instant Messenger that for some reason makes FS9 crash when the kneeboard is
> clicked. I can't remember the exact name but I'm sure one of the experts
> here will remember it. They helped me with that a while back. Crash, Snake
> anybody???
>
> Not4wood
I found that my old computer would CTD every time I was involved with a
hi-density airport e.g. LAX, KLAS, KDEN. At the time, I was advised it
could either be my video card or lack of RAM. My new computer has 2
gigs of RAM and hardly ever accesses the hard drive. Really a dream,
but you know what? It still occasionally CTD's...and the error message
points to my video card. Says I have to update the drivers which I
plan on doing as soon as I can. I have an ATI Radeon x1300 card with
old drivers. Hopefully, that will end the CTD's forever. I don't get
any more crashes near the airports I mentioned any longer though, and I
think it's the additional RAM.
Now that I've said all that, 'anybody' can probably give a better
answer : )
SnakeEyes >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 18, 2006 Posts: 658
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 1:25 am
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Crash to Desktop:
There are several fixes. First one is the most applied. What version Of FS
due you have??? Are you using FS9 and did up upgrade to FS9.1? This will
correct a lot of CTD's.
Also, when you are flying and it does ctd what are you doing at that moment?
Are you looking at your kneeboard?? I remember that there is a file in AOL
Instant Messenger that for some reason makes FS9 crash when the kneeboard is
clicked. I can't remember the exact name but I'm sure one of the experts
here will remember it. They helped me with that a while back. Crash, Snake
anybody???
Not4wood
"SnakeEyes" <agalspector DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147209107.886945.224640@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>
> Quai wrote:
>> Have tried twice: taking off from Singapore Changi with a Airbus A 340
>> 500,
>> toward Newark (yes, I'm trying the longest real flight in the world) and
>> about 10 minutes after take off, at the same point, FS9 quits to desktop
>> with no error messages: it just dies.
>> Have no sceneries in that area (Changi airport is default) except
>> FSgenesis
>> and GE. Any clue?
>
> I was having numerous occasions when my FS9 would crash to desktop, and
> I learned through trial and error it was my video card causing the
> problem. I upgraded the drivers and it seemed to help.
>
>> Another question: according to Singapore Airlines, Singapore flight from
>> Changi to Newark takes about 18 hours. When planning the route with FSNav
>> it
>> actually takes 18 hours as well, provided that I dont calculate any high
>> altitudes point (i.e. it takes 18 hours with a direct GPS flight),
>> whereas
>> with a high altitudes calculated route it takes more than 21 hours: whats
>> wrong?
>>
> GPS flights are direct - the shortest distance between the two
> destinations even though the path may appear to loop with the curvature
> of the earth. If you notice, the plane never makes any turns when
> using the GPS direct navigation system.
>
> When using the established high altitude flight paths, you must follow
> routes which have been layed out according to waypoints for specific
> purposes to accomodate geography and other traffic and may not be the
> most direct (I will stand corrected if anyone knows more than I do
> about the subject).
>
>> thanks to all
>>
>> Quai
>
> Was wondering, since I like to take long-distance flights myself:
>
> What do you do during the flight? Do you save it and continue flying
> when you can or do you accelerate it or do you just let the plane fly
> on AP while you do other things?
>
> I love using FSPassengers, and it won't allow me to save a flight and
> come back to it. If I do an international flight, I don't use FSP and
> fly empty which really isn't as much fun.
>
>
> SnakeEyes
> >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 06, 2006 Posts: 77
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 9:25 am
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"SnakeEyes" <agalspector DeleteThis @hotmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:1147209107.886945.224640@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Was wondering, since I like to take long-distance flights myself:
>
> What do you do during the flight? Do you save it and continue flying
> when you can or do you accelerate it or do you just let the plane fly
> on AP while you do other things?
>
> I love using FSPassengers, and it won't allow me to save a flight and
> come back to it. If I do an international flight, I don't use FSP and
> fly empty which really isn't as much fun.
>
>
> SnakeEyes
Hi SnakeEyes,
I also use FSP and, in general, I just pause the flight if the arrival time
is foreseen while I'm in bed..... otherwise I let the flight continues
overnight and am back in time for descending/landing. Sometimes I
accelerate.
Quai >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 16, 2006 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
If it's in the exact same spot, could it be a corrupt FS9 file that is
only accessed at that point (either texture or mesh)? Have you tried
re-instigating the textures from the CD or reinstalling FSGenesis/GE?
Otherwise, it may be the graphics card overheating. However, when I get
this the 'puter just locks dead not CTD. I have an antiquated Radeon
9550 and it is passively cooled (which doesn't like the 40C+ Oz summer!)
and it occasionally overheats.
As to the other question, does the RL flight take into account the
jetstream effect? Is there a corresponding Newark to Singapore flight,
if not, it probably means that it's only possible one way due to the
high level jetstream helping in one direction and hindering you in the
other.
Cheers...
AndyR
Quai wrote:
> Have tried twice: taking off from Singapore Changi with a Airbus A 340 500,
> toward Newark (yes, I'm trying the longest real flight in the world) and
> about 10 minutes after take off, at the same point, FS9 quits to desktop
> with no error messages: it just dies.
> Have no sceneries in that area (Changi airport is default) except FSgenesis
> and GE. Any clue?
>
> Another question: according to Singapore Airlines, Singapore flight from
> Changi to Newark takes about 18 hours. When planning the route with FSNav it
> actually takes 18 hours as well, provided that I dont calculate any high
> altitudes point (i.e. it takes 18 hours with a direct GPS flight), whereas
> with a high altitudes calculated route it takes more than 21 hours: whats
> wrong?
>
> thanks to all
>
> Quai
>
> >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 06, 2006 Posts: 77
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"AndyR" <andy_miranda.DeleteThis@curl.aunz.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:4461825b$1@news1.veridas.net...
> If it's in the exact same spot, could it be a corrupt FS9 file that is
> only accessed at that point (either texture or mesh)? Have you tried
> re-instigating the textures from the CD or reinstalling FSGenesis/GE?
I do suspect is a failure in fs9 as it happens exactly at the same point. >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 16, 2006 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 3:20 am
Post subject: Re: FS9 quits to desktop [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Make sure all your drivers are up to date. Also reinstalling FS can
help.
On Tue, 9 May 2006 11:13:11 +0200, "Quai" <ali RemoveThis @talia.com> wrote:
>Have tried twice: taking off from Singapore Changi with a Airbus A 340 500,
>toward Newark (yes, I'm trying the longest real flight in the world) and
>about 10 minutes after take off, at the same point, FS9 quits to desktop
>with no error messages: it just dies.
>Have no sceneries in that area (Changi airport is default) except FSgenesis
>and GE. Any clue?
>
>Another question: according to Singapore Airlines, Singapore flight from
>Changi to Newark takes about 18 hours. When planning the route with FSNav it
>actually takes 18 hours as well, provided that I dont calculate any high
>altitudes point (i.e. it takes 18 hours with a direct GPS flight), whereas
>with a high altitudes calculated route it takes more than 21 hours: whats
>wrong?
>
>thanks to all
>
>Quai
> >> Stay informed about: FS9 quits to desktop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|