Welcome to GameHourz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Extended Range, implemented stupidly?

 
   Game Forums (Home) -> Everquest RSS
Related Topics:
dmg/delay question - So not really the mechanics behind this topic I have a simple question. Current weapon is 36/40 If I change to a 32/36 will my DPS be effected overall? It's a drop of 4 on both sides so usually 4=4 but ... I just like the..

Confused - Is there a site that fully explains the use of and of the various shrouds?

Philter of the ant - Has anyone found the recpie for the Philter of the any potion yet ??? Sareman 65 Monk Fennin Ro

Everquest UI - Hi All For purely personal reasons, I didn't like *some* of the features of the new UI Sony have given us (If you like it, that's great though, heh). I like the old-style 2 X 5 Hotbutton bars, rather than the ones, and I like the old spell..

Moving UI to new computer - I want to set up a new computer with EQ and want to put all my UI settings on it. Which files do I need to copy?
Author Message
Lance Berg

External


Since: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 552



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:13 am
Post subject: Extended Range, implemented stupidly?
Archived from groups: alt>games>everquest (more info?)

Browsing around, I found a description of ER that looked a bit flawed.

Apparantly target is checked, if its in normal range then spell goes off
as if normal.

If its NOT in normal range, then a second check is made to see if its in
extended range. If it is, spell goes off as extended range, if not,
then you just can't cast.

But here's the funny thing:

If you cast on a target which moves beyond range before the spell goes
off, then you fail. Which is fine of course.

Except that, due to the funny implementation, this means you can cast on
a target which is within normal range, but which moves out into extended
range, so you get a spell failure.

To see how funny that is, imagine two mages with similar gear, casting
on two targets; one is in normal range but moving away, the other is out
at the far end of extended range. Mage one casts and gets a fail,
because his target has moved out of normal range, meanwhile mage two
hits, because his target was in extended range all along...even though
its noticably further away than the one Mage one failed to hit!

Range isn't actually that big a concern for my mage most of the time,
but thinking back, this effect messed up my cleric's CHeals a time or
two and I never understood why; the guy I was trying to heal was moving
in and out of extended range, never out so far as to be past ER, now I
get why I'd nonetheless sometimes get odd results!

 >> Stay informed about: Extended Range, implemented stupidly? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Game Forums (Home) -> Everquest All times are: Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]