Just Discovered... Forgotten Worlds

i meant final fight.

whoops!

Pez D Spencer wrote:
> i thought the snes version of final fantasy was superior...people just
> need to get over that they can't play guy. i didn't think the sega cd
> version was very good.
 >> Stay informed about: Just Discovered... Forgotten Worlds 

> i thought the snes version of final fight was superior...people just
> need to get over that they can't play guy. i didn't think the sega cd
> version was very good.

Hmmmm, well, it's all a matter of opinion...but why did you think the
SCD version sucked? Didn't like the redone, redbook soundtrack, or that
it was two player and Guy was in there? I mean, granted, the SNES has
more onscreen color, but that slowdown and the lack of enemies on
screen, to me, just didn't make up for anything. Just sort of curious
on your thoughts.

Bel
 >> Stay informed about: Just Discovered... Forgotten Worlds 

although i've reliazed -- from reading my own posts -- that i need to
make sure not to used the term "sucked" as much, i don't think i used
it in relation to final fight. i had to re-read my post to make sure
that i didn't.

i ran out and got the sega-cd version when it was released. i just
didn't feel it was as tight control-wise or as good graphically as the
snes version. the extra level didn't do that much for me, either.

i'd have to comapre them side-by-side now to give you a better opinion.

i just know that i had more fun with the snes version the two years or
so prior to the sega-cd release. it was old hat by then.

BelPowerslave wrote:
> > i thought the snes version of final fight was superior...people just
> > need to get over that they can't play guy. i didn't think the sega cd
> > version was very good.
>
> Hmmmm, well, it's all a matter of opinion...but why did you think the
> SCD version sucked? Didn't like the redone, redbook soundtrack, or that
> it was two player and Guy was in there? I mean, granted, the SNES has
> more onscreen color, but that slowdown and the lack of enemies on
> screen, to me, just didn't make up for anything. Just sort of curious
> on your thoughts.
>
> Bel
 >> Stay informed about: Just Discovered... Forgotten Worlds 

> i ran out and got the sega-cd version when it was released. i just
> didn't feel it was as tight control-wise or as good graphically as the
> snes version. the extra level didn't do that much for me, either.

I've always thought the SNES version was a little too tight, like it
was almost hard to get the characters moving. Of course, I seem to have
that issue with a lot of SNES games so I guess it could just be the
pad. It'd go with the theory that games feel looser on the Genesis due
to the looser pad...but I think that's just kind of nutty thinking on
my part.

> i'd have to comapre them side-by-side now to give you a better opinion.
>
> i just know that i had more fun with the snes version the two years or
> so prior to the sega-cd release. it was old hat by then.

I can dig it. I've often times noticed that the order in which I play
something has a lot to do with how I see other versions of the game.
For a lot of arcade ports that I first played on the Genesis, and then
played in the arcade or via MAME, even though they are graphically
superior, and the audio is often times better, they don't seem to
compare to the Genesis versions to me.

Bel
--
Whip Ass Gaming: http://www.whipassgaming.com/
 >> Stay informed about: Just Discovered... Forgotten Worlds