(DECK) Wraith Diary

In article <47ad0d74 RemoveThis @dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
Salem <salem_christ.geo RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:

> Get an Unmaskening first, you then have 2 dead draws in your deck. One
> of which you can use up a valuable master phase action to remove the
> other, but still. Maybe it should be a barrens instead?

Even if you draw an Unmaskening first, you can still play a Fortran
later and pull the other Unmaskening out of your deck and immediately
discard it. Yeah, again, an MPA (but if it is the only master in your
hand, how does it hurt you to play it?), but still, generally much
better then just having 3 of the same event in your deck.

3x Unmaskening means a reasonable chance of seeing an Unmaskening, and
then having 2 cards you need to discard.

2x Unmaskeing and a Fortran Library means the exact same chance of
seeing an Unmaskening, but you also have the ability to swap an MPA for
getting the other two cards (effectively) out of your deck without
having to use discard actions.

Peter D Bakija
pdb6 RemoveThis @lightlink.com
http://www.lightlink.com/pdb6/vtes.html

"Find hungry samurai."
-The Old Man

Mr_Wyrm (AKA Pentex) wrote:
> on the "slight advantage effects" way, more advantages of 2 copies of
> unmasking + 1 copy of FL v/s 3 copies of unmasking:
>
> 1.- if you have unmasking in play and you draw another unmasking, its
> a 100% dead card.
>
> 2.- if you draw FL, are few cards that enable to use FL as "discard a
> master card" and could, eventually, give you a little advantage:
>
> opponent Chas Giovanni Tello or Jacob, The Glitch.
> steal Brothers Grimm.
>
> the topic "In the category of obscure specials" cause me a new
> approach to the game

fair enough. However, I was coming at it from a wacky zany kind of angle
where you might actually want to play a useful master card every turn.

--
salem
(replace 'hotmail' with 'yahoo' to email)