Consimworld forums Down- AGAIN!

"Dav Vandenbroucke" <dav_and_frances_vandenbroucke DeleteThis @compuserve.com> wrote in
message news:es3uv2hg854dakhrj2seasjbk2i24evhvc@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:13:48 GMT, "David \"the preacher\" Wilson"
> <grantbaptist DeleteThis @verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>Consimworld owes its paying customers more than it currently is providing.
>
> This is pretty much why I thought that the subscription system was a
> bad idea. It started as a way to help John Kranz with the bills. Now
> people feel they have a right to tell him how to run things and whine
> when they're not happy.

Of course they do! If I'm paying for something and don't get it, I'm
perfectly entitled to complain. We, in the wargaming community. have a
tendency to make allowances for the shortcomings of our 'suppliers'. But
things have changed since the good old days of the 70s and 80s - if they're
in business, they should expect to be judged on the same basis as any other
commercial enterprise.

> I'm sure John didn't like having the forum
> down either.
>
> It came back around lunchtime, by the way.
>
>
>
> Dav Vandenbroucke
> davanden at cox dot net
 >> Stay informed about: Consimworld forums Down- AGAIN!