Welcome to GameHourz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher?

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Game Forums (Home) -> Flight-Sim RSS
Next:  WTB: Still looking for a Stargate bezel!  
Author Message
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:55 am
Post subject: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher?
Archived from groups: alt>games>microsoft>flight-sim (more info?)

It seems that MSFS puts a stick pusher in the Baron 58, but apparently
the real aircraft doesn't have one. What's the real deal?

At least I assume it's a stick pusher. I can't stall the aircraft; it
beeps and pitches down, as if something pushed the yoke forward (but I
don't have a real yoke in the sim, so I don't know for sure). I don't
like this. Why is it there?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dallas

External


Since: Feb 15, 2005
Posts: 2302



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mxsmanic"
> I can't stall the aircraft; it
> beeps and pitches down, as if something pushed the yoke forward


It sounds like you *are* stalling the aircraft. The "beep" (stall horn)
indicates that your wings are achieving a stalled state.

When your nose pitches down you are actually performing something called a
"stall break".

Aircraft are design to have their center of gravity forward of the center of
lift. Before your wings run out of lift, your elevator will run out of
sufficient air flow to counteract the nose heavy condition of the aircraft
and the nose pitches down.

This is usually a good thing unless you are at a low altitude.

What were you expecting the aircraft to do in a stall?

Dallas

 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beech45Whiskey

External


Since: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 680



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:00 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mxsmanic <mxsmanic DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems that MSFS puts a stick pusher in the Baron 58, but apparently
> the real aircraft doesn't have one. What's the real deal?

There is no "stick pusher" in the sim's Baron or the real life version of
this aircraft.

I wouldn't base any conclusions about the sim's default aircraft, as their
models are quite basic.

--
Peter
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beech45Whiskey

External


Since: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 680



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:16 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Beech45Whiskey <pjricc RemoveThis @ZZgmail.com> wrote:

> I wouldn't base any conclusions about the sim's default aircraft, as their
> models are quite basic.

This should read:

> I wouldn't base any conclusions *ON* the sim's default aircraft...

--
Peter
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dallas writes:

> It sounds like you *are* stalling the aircraft. The "beep" (stall horn)
> indicates that your wings are achieving a stalled state.

Then why can't I continue to pitch the nose up? I can do it on other
aircraft.

> When your nose pitches down you are actually performing something called a
> "stall break".
>
> Aircraft are design to have their center of gravity forward of the center of
> lift. Before your wings run out of lift, your elevator will run out of
> sufficient air flow to counteract the nose heavy condition of the aircraft
> and the nose pitches down.
>
> This is usually a good thing unless you are at a low altitude.
>
> What were you expecting the aircraft to do in a stall?

I was expecting it to continue pitching upward, like other aircraft
do.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Beech45Whiskey writes:

> I wouldn't base any conclusions about the sim's default aircraft, as their
> models are quite basic.

Then logically there should be no beep or sudden movement of the
aircraft, unless that's what happens in real life.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

External


Since: Aug 18, 2006
Posts: 152



(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mxsmanic wrote:
>> What were you expecting the aircraft to do in a stall?
>
> I was expecting it to continue pitching upward, like other aircraft
> do.


Where did you get the idea that other aircraft do that? None that I've ever
flown in real life have. The nose comes up until the stall breaks, then the
nose falls back down. If you regain flying speed then you can pick up the nose
again.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dallas

External


Since: Feb 15, 2005
Posts: 2302



(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mxsmanic"
> I was expecting it to continue pitching upward, like other aircraft
> do.

What other aircraft are you talking about?

Unless the aircraft has very high power to weight ratio, continuing to pitch
up will result in a stall break in almost all aircraft. I haven't tried it,
but in theory you should be able to do in the B747.


Dallas
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roger

External


Since: Aug 19, 2006
Posts: 219



(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:34:07 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic.DeleteThis@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dallas writes:
>
>> It sounds like you *are* stalling the aircraft. The "beep" (stall horn)
>> indicates that your wings are achieving a stalled state.
>
>Then why can't I continue to pitch the nose up? I can do it on other
>aircraft.
>
>> When your nose pitches down you are actually performing something called a
>> "stall break".
>>
>> Aircraft are design to have their center of gravity forward of the center of
>> lift. Before your wings run out of lift, your elevator will run out of

I've never flown one yet that didn't still have some elevator
authority in the stall. In a Cherokee 180 the controls still appear
to be working normally with the elevator still having the ability to
raise and lower the nose and to use the ailerons in turns. Everything
appears normal except for a bit of stabilator shake and one whale of a
descent rate. You don't even think about touching the ailerons in
the Bonanza when in a stalled condition.

>> sufficient air flow to counteract the nose heavy condition of the aircraft
>> and the nose pitches down.

IRL you can do a departure stall (power on stall) in a Cessna 150,
172, Cherokee 180, and the Bonanza family without the nose dropping.
IE you can hold it up although it takes some practice in the Bo or you
are going to end up inverted.

To break the stall, do not push the yoke forward. Just release enough
back pressure to let the nose down the horizon. With practice you can
do departure stalls with no loss of altitude (done that in both the Bo
and 172) and with little of no loss on power off stalls. Again I've
done this in both the 172 and Bo.

Power off stalls in the Bo can be done with out the nose dropping
below the horizon, but it's a real hand full holding it there. It'll
take on a new personality and disposition and behave as if it's trying
to toss you out. It'll shake, the nose will make 20 to 30 or even 40
degree excursions, (kinda like a dog sneezing repeatedly) and it'll
do its best to drop a wing and roll inverted into a spin. However with
practice you can learn to hold it in the stall and keep it greasy side
down.
OTOH when the stall breaks if you ease off on the back pressure while
adding throttle it's very well behaved. Just don't jam the throttle in
to recover from a stalled condition or at Vmc as you might in a 150 or
172.. That is guaranteed to remove the boredom from your day.

>>
>> This is usually a good thing unless you are at a low altitude.
>>
>> What were you expecting the aircraft to do in a stall?
>
>I was expecting it to continue pitching upward, like other aircraft
>do.
Do you mean you expect the nose to continue to increase the pitch
angle, or do you mean hold the current angle?

Depending on the attitude the aircraft is in when it stalls, most
light aircraft will drop the nose slightly, but easing off the back
pressure on the yoke while applying power should make recovery
possible without the nose ever dropping below the horizon.

I've never flown a Baron, but there were several on the field and the
comments were they feel just like flying a Bo but with a bit more
inertia due to the heavier weight.

The Baron adds an extra 400# plus in just the second engine and it
carries more fuel than the Bo. So the Baron has a lot more inertia in
stalls which are usually practiced at substantial altitude. I believe
the fuselage is the same as the longer Bo, but as I recall the wing
and tail are stronger. The Bo and Baron both use the same control
surfaces.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dallas writes:

> What other aircraft are you talking about?

The 737-400 was the other one I had in mind. The Extra 300S doesn't
seem to pitch forward abruptly, either.

> Unless the aircraft has very high power to weight ratio, continuing to pitch
> up will result in a stall break in almost all aircraft. I haven't tried it,
> but in theory you should be able to do in the B747.

I'll have to try it.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roger writes:

> Do you mean you expect the nose to continue to increase the pitch
> angle, or do you mean hold the current angle?

Usually if I stall I can still increase the angle by holding back on
the stick. In this Baron there's a sound of some kind (sounds like a
loud squeak) and the nose immediately drops violently by 30-40
degrees. It just seems like some automated system is doing it, rather
than just the aerodynamics of the aircraft. In other sim aircraft I
can still and still continue pointing the nose further upward.

> Depending on the attitude the aircraft is in when it stalls, most
> light aircraft will drop the nose slightly, but easing off the back
> pressure on the yoke while applying power should make recovery
> possible without the nose ever dropping below the horizon.

I'll worry about recovery after I succeed in clearly stalling it. In
the Baron, it seems to be impossible.

> I've never flown a Baron, but there were several on the field and the
> comments were they feel just like flying a Bo but with a bit more
> inertia due to the heavier weight.

I'm not familiar with the latter.

> The Baron adds an extra 400# plus in just the second engine and it
> carries more fuel than the Bo. So the Baron has a lot more inertia in
> stalls which are usually practiced at substantial altitude. I believe
> the fuselage is the same as the longer Bo, but as I recall the wing
> and tail are stronger. The Bo and Baron both use the same control
> surfaces.

Well, if you could try the Baron in FS2004 and tell me what's going on
I'd appreciate it. I really want to know if this is some sort of
automated stall protection or if this violent drop in the nose is
aerodynamic. Of course, if it's not behaving like the real thing, it
might be difficult to tell what the sim is trying to simulate.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dallas

External


Since: Feb 15, 2005
Posts: 2302



(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:55 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Roger"
> I've never flown one yet that didn't still have some elevator
> authority in the stall.

Thanks Roger, I stand corrected. I was over thinking the aerodynamics last
night.

Dallas
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
"Roger

External


Since: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 111



(Msg. 13) Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:54 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:50:17 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic.DeleteThis@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Roger writes:
>
>> Do you mean you expect the nose to continue to increase the pitch
>> angle, or do you mean hold the current angle?
>
>Usually if I stall I can still increase the angle by holding back on
>the stick. In this Baron there's a sound of some kind (sounds like a

IRL that doesn't usually happen unless you "zoom" up and stall at a
very nose high attitude.

>loud squeak) and the nose immediately drops violently by 30-40

Even the Bonanza can drop rather abruptly it you slip up. After flying
mine one local couple decided to stay with a Piper Archer.

>degrees. It just seems like some automated system is doing it, rather
>than just the aerodynamics of the aircraft. In other sim aircraft I
>can still and still continue pointing the nose further upward.

That doesn't sound realistic. OTOH I may have flown a number of planes
but there are far more than I haven't flown than I have.

>
>> Depending on the attitude the aircraft is in when it stalls, most
>> light aircraft will drop the nose slightly, but easing off the back
>> pressure on the yoke while applying power should make recovery
>> possible without the nose ever dropping below the horizon.
>
>I'll worry about recovery after I succeed in clearly stalling it. In
>the Baron, it seems to be impossible.
>
>> I've never flown a Baron, but there were several on the field and the
>> comments were they feel just like flying a Bo but with a bit more
>> inertia due to the heavier weight.
>
>I'm not familiar with the latter.

Bo = Bonanza. It seems like they had one in the earlier versions of
FS, but maybe not. I know they do in "On Top Vs 8".

>
>> The Baron adds an extra 400# plus in just the second engine and it
>> carries more fuel than the Bo. So the Baron has a lot more inertia in
>> stalls which are usually practiced at substantial altitude. I believe
>> the fuselage is the same as the longer Bo, but as I recall the wing
>> and tail are stronger. The Bo and Baron both use the same control
>> surfaces.
>
>Well, if you could try the Baron in FS2004 and tell me what's going on
>I'd appreciate it. I really want to know if this is some sort of
>automated stall protection or if this violent drop in the nose is

No, there is no automated stall protection in any of the Bonanzas or
Barons. IRL They do have interconnected Ailerons and Rudder which is
kinda, sorta like the auto rudder function in FS, but not quite.

>aerodynamic. Of course, if it's not behaving like the real thing, it
>might be difficult to tell what the sim is trying to simulate.

That's on the computer in the shop and it's 4:45 AM so IF I can
remember I'll give it a try tomorrow. I don't even have a joystick on
this 64 bit machine.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mxsmanic

External


Since: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 1871



(Msg. 14) Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:55 am
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roger (K8RI) writes:

> Even the Bonanza can drop rather abruptly it you slip up. After flying
> mine one local couple decided to stay with a Piper Archer.

But there's no danger in the nose dropping suddenly after a
stall--right?

> That doesn't sound realistic. OTOH I may have flown a number of planes
> but there are far more than I haven't flown than I have.

To some extent I'm comparing large multiengine jet transports (737) to
tiny GA planes (Baron), so perhaps there are some major differences.

> Bo = Bonanza. It seems like they had one in the earlier versions of
> FS, but maybe not. I know they do in "On Top Vs 8".

The only Beechcraft I see in FS 2004 is the Baron 58.

> No, there is no automated stall protection in any of the Bonanzas or
> Barons. IRL They do have interconnected Ailerons and Rudder which is
> kinda, sorta like the auto rudder function in FS, but not quite.

Hmm. How does it work? Should I have rudder and ailerons set to be
independent in FS?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tom Orle

External


Since: Feb 15, 2005
Posts: 493



(Msg. 15) Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mxsmanic <mxsmanic DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:

>To some extent I'm comparing large multiengine jet transports (737) to
>tiny GA planes (Baron), so perhaps there are some major differences.

Why are you even comparing the stall behavior of swept wing acft to
straight wing acft? Of course there are differences.

Apples & oranges ...

-=tom=-
 >> Stay informed about: Does the Baron 58 really have a stick pusher? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
FSX-Baron - Flies better than FS9...found the turns and rudder control more realistic and also when you reduce the throttle to idle the plane stops and doesnt creep forward as before.. Water really is spectacular at altitude.. See...I can post positives as well....

SMALL gamepad with a stick for FS9 ? - Hi, Finally built a computer for my 6-yr old son, and now I am looking for a nice gamepad for him too. I have had many game controllers in my gamer career, from wheels, yokes, pedals to Saitek HOTASes and Logitech joysticks, but one game controller ....

Joy stick problems - just getting old, or can it be fixed? - I have a Microsoft precision2 joystick. Downloaded a new aircraft last week and while flying it, I noticed that the throttle wasn't going to 100% on takeoff. I could use the mouse to advance the throttle all the way, but the joystick alone wouldn't get....

Anyone know of a bluetooth stick or yoke? - I've recently got a new desktop PC with bluetooth keyboard and mouse - and hence a bluetooth adapter in the PC. Having just got into FS2004 I decided to buy a decent controller - plenty about, it seems. However, I'm short of space in my home office, and....

Question on Baron 58 prop control - On the real Baron 58, is there any forward thrust at all with the props feathered (or set to zero)? I have a slider set to the prop controls and if I set it to zero the plane will still drift forward slowly as I advance the throttles. I'm not clear on....
   Game Forums (Home) -> Flight-Sim All times are: Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]