Army of Two. Perfect game to tie me over until RSV2

Picked it up on my way home from work. Just went through the training
mode and finished a couple of missions. I like it. It's no COD4,
GoW, RSV, nor GRAW2 for that matter, but has been an auspicious
beginning thus far.

I'm still getting used to the controls, and other the nuances of the
game, such as the camera viewing angle and etc. The graphics are
pretty good and the frenetic gun sounds during battles is great.

You actually can't die in this game at all, which makes it a bit of a
semi serious shooter. If you take too much damage, you just fall down
and your partner comes to drag you to a cover and your health
regenerates.

I like the back to back battle mode in the game during which everythng
slows down to slo-mo and the enemies get dumber. Then there's the
riot shield usage in which you get yourself a shield, like a car door
and your partner gets up behind you to kill the enemies.

Sadly, it doesn't let you start off on the hardest level. So, I'm
starting off on the middle level. Why can't game developers just let
you start off on the hardest level, like COD4???

I was hoping to be able to find a game to play until RSV2 came out and
I'm glad I went and picked this up after work. I know the review
scores haven't been that great, but I'm still liking it so far.

Haven't tried the game online yet. I'm one of those people who likes
to finish a game on the hardest level before heading over to Live.
Anyway, if any of you were pondering what to do until RSV2 came out,
just might wanna give this game a try.

I went into EBGames wed to reserve
GTA IV and RSV2 ,and almost picked up a copy of Army Of Two,I hadn't
realized it was out. But after getting burned on Kane-N-Lynch I was
hesitant to pick it up. I'm gonna definitely rent it tomorrow.

I'm still bewildered as to why more people aren't playing Frontlines
though,the single player is more fun than COD4 . I wish more people
would give the game a try and at least complete the entire campaign. I
don't think the demo was a representation of the full game's experience.
In one later level I completed 90% with a (full size) helicopter and
10% on foot, then another run through with tanks 90% and 10% on foot,and
yet again 100% entirely on foot calling in air strikes and using turret
drones and helicopter drones, or a combination of all of the above ,all
on the same level. The options are near endless.The only downside is the
difficulty. I wish it was harder ,even the hardest difficulty isn't that
hard,but it's still fun as hell. I think its easier because you have so
many options at your disposal. I don't think they sold the game well
when debuting it, they didn't show people all of the games perks,like I
just found out about some of environments are completley destructable,
It wasn't until I set up a rail turret/emp that I was blasting large
portions of small houses and buildings.Also some of the cement defenses
are destructable ,but you have to land a grenade just right to break it.
You really have to experiment to see what's destructable. But with the
game being a little on the easy side, I could see where people would
just blow through and miss all the good stuff. Raise the difficulty and
give it a run through,its fun.