 |
|
|
|
Related Topics:
| [40k] Tarantula rules - Which of the varies books are rules for in? (I'm thinking of using the Tarantula I've in my old Space Crusade bits)
infantry markerlight[40k][model] - I'm thinking of giving at least one of my FCW shas'uis a Is there one on the FCW sprue? At the moment I don't have access to my Tau bit-box, and I can't remember if there is one on the sprue. If there isn't one on the sprue it should be..
[40K] 2006 Grand Tournament RulesPack Question - Good Day All, I am a frequent lurker and rare poster to this group, but I have been doing searches for awhile and can't find some that I know was on here not too long ago. Someone had noted that there were army that were not..
[40K] Revised Target Priority - I've been working on some ideas for reworking the Target Priority rules for 40K, which I find pretty lacking. I've posted the file on genbus in the files section (Target Priority 2.1 pdf). I look forward to any comments. Tim -- I can..
40K SM Scouts. Thinking Outside The {SM} Box? - Gday as with all hobbies, this one is Made all the more so because I to do I want to do a Scout Company and am thinking of using Cadians and Catachans as some of my Scout units. Ok, real world is that its about..
|
|
|
Next: Warhammer 40k: [GW] [40k] Codex Daemonica Rumour
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Apr 19, 2007
Posts: 150
|
(Msg. 46) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:22 am
Post subject: Re: 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>games>miniatures>warhammer (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jan 13, 3:39 am, "Ward B." <war....DeleteThis@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote:
> "Erik Setzer" wrote
>
> > "The Cheshire Cat" wrote:
> >>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>
> >>> Hmm again...
>
> >>much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will never
> >>get it right.
>
> > Wonderful, just what I need, the thought of Gav Thorpe authoring a
> > GW-branded Kama Sutra.
>
> There's room in there for a line about xtra spiky bitz, but I ain't touchin'
> it. 
>
what? you mean like how Chaos Space Marine Lords went overnight from
something to be feared, to a glorified French Tickler? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Dec 30, 2004
Posts: 369
|
(Msg. 47) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:05 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >
>>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm again...
>>>
>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>> never get it right.
>>
>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>
> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep
i bet that's the same excuse you give your girlfriend |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 30, 2004
Posts: 369
|
(Msg. 48) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Erik Setzer" <kgavrin-at-gmail-dot-com> wrote in message
news:o94jo35mk3od2519aqg29934bs6ac7t8cm@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:24:11 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
> <Roknese DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>>8. Vehicles without a WS in CC always get hit in the rear armour.
>>>
>>> Cool. That should help eliminate whining about where my Tankbustas
>>> charge the vehicle.
>>
>>and why do things always have to be in me when gw make rules?
>
> Because all our opinions are based on how the rules affect us - our
> favorite army, our style of play. Gamers are selfish by nature.
pffft. speak for yourself, buddy. last i checked, it took 2 people to
enjoy a game of 40k. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 03, 2006
Posts: 196
|
(Msg. 49) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:10 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Doctor Rock" <malafex.TakeThisOut@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:P9nij.183911$cJ3.53295@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Erik Setzer" <kgavrin-at-gmail-dot-com> wrote in message
> news:o94jo35mk3od2519aqg29934bs6ac7t8cm@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:24:11 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
>> <Roknese.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>8. Vehicles without a WS in CC always get hit in the rear armour.
>>>>
>>>> Cool. That should help eliminate whining about where my Tankbustas
>>>> charge the vehicle.
>>>
>>>and why do things always have to be in me when gw make rules?
>>
>> Because all our opinions are based on how the rules affect us - our
>> favorite army, our style of play. Gamers are selfish by nature.
>
> pffft. speak for yourself, buddy. last i checked, it took 2 people to
> enjoy a game of 40k.
people enjoy 40k? I thought it was just foreplay for the
homepyronecrobestialityfest that followed, the winner getting to be on top. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 162
|
(Msg. 50) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:15 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:39:36 -0800, "Ward B."
<wardcb DeleteThis @NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote:
>
>"Erik Setzer" wrote
>> "The Cheshire Cat" wrote:
>
>>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm again...
>>>
>>>much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will never
>>>get it right.
>>
>> Wonderful, just what I need, the thought of Gav Thorpe authoring a
>> GW-branded Kama Sutra.
>
>There's room in there for a line about xtra spiky bitz, but I ain't touchin'
>it.
The line, or the spiky bit?
--
Erik
Insert soulless sig file here. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 162
|
(Msg. 51) Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:17 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:07:11 GMT, "Doctor Rock"
<malafex.RemoveThis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>"Erik Setzer" <kgavrin-at-gmail-dot-com> wrote in message
>news:o94jo35mk3od2519aqg29934bs6ac7t8cm@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:24:11 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
>> <Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>8. Vehicles without a WS in CC always get hit in the rear armour.
>>>>
>>>> Cool. That should help eliminate whining about where my Tankbustas
>>>> charge the vehicle.
>>>
>>>and why do things always have to be in me when gw make rules?
>>
>> Because all our opinions are based on how the rules affect us - our
>> favorite army, our style of play. Gamers are selfish by nature.
>
>pffft. speak for yourself, buddy. last i checked, it took 2 people to
>enjoy a game of 40k.
That's true, yes, but first and foremost, when a new army book or
edition of the game is released, what's your first thought? "How will
this affect me, my style of play, and/or my army?"
--
Erik
Insert soulless sig file here. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 52) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:02 am
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Doctor Rock" <malafex RemoveThis @blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:68nij.186642$S37.75591@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >
>>>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm again...
>>>>
>>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>>> never get it right.
>>>
>>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>>
>> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep
>
> i bet that's the same excuse you give your girlfriend
>
no, the excuse i gave her was "but i didnt aim for your eye!" >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 53) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:54 am
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>
> maybe it's a generation thing, and i'm just an old-fashioned fart, but i
> know what i like. and i've just not been very impressed with most of GW's
> published material the past few years.
i just quit alltogether and started playing mmorps and dnd. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 54) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:55 am
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 55) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:57 am
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Janet Quick" <j_quick RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:C3AEC6DB.321F%j_quick@comcast.net...
> On 1/12/08 3:53 PM, in article
> lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com,
> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>> 13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm again...
>>>>
>>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>>> never get it right.
>>>
>>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>>
>> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep
>> when i
>> wrote it.
>>
> Which just proves spell check was programmed by a man <grin>
>
yer tellin me. i did hit the spelling check and it didnt say it was wrong. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 162
|
(Msg. 56) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:09 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:55:47 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
<Roknese.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Someone actually told me recently I should play Dwarfs because I kept
>> grumbling about remembering the way things used to be.
>
>you will never be awesome enough to play the dwarves. ever.
I'm going to play them. It's just a matter of getting my dad to
actually build the bloody things so I don't have to.
--
Erik
Insert soulless sig file here. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 27, 2007
Posts: 162
|
(Msg. 57) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:13 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:54:41 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
<Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>> maybe it's a generation thing, and i'm just an old-fashioned fart, but i
>> know what i like. and i've just not been very impressed with most of GW's
>> published material the past few years.
>
>i just quit alltogether and started playing mmorps and dnd.
You're not the cat I thought you were...
--
Erik
Insert soulless sig file here. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 29, 2005
Posts: 71
|
(Msg. 58) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:07 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Qvednf6ewYkyZBfanZ2dnUVZ_vqpnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Janet Quick" <j_quick RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:C3AEC6DB.321F%j_quick@comcast.net...
>> On 1/12/08 3:53 PM, in article
>> lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com,
>> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> 13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm again...
>>>>>
>>>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>>>> never get it right.
>>>>
>>>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>>>
>>> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep
>>> when i
>>> wrote it.
>>>
>> Which just proves spell check was programmed by a man <grin>
>>
>
> yer tellin me. i did hit the spelling check and it didnt say it was wrong.
As far as I know, all spelling checkers can feel by touch whether it is a
woman on the keys or not. It is the sensitive touch, or maybe the way in
which a female types, or says, "Oh baby, Oh baby, you are great....."
Berto >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 29, 2005
Posts: 71
|
(Msg. 59) Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:08 pm
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:qZSdnT1CfvhzcRfanZ2dnUVZ_r-vnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Doctor Rock" <malafex.TakeThisOut@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:68nij.186642$S37.75591@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> >
>>>>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm again...
>>>>>
>>>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>>>> never get it right.
>>>>
>>>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>>>
>>> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep
>>
>> i bet that's the same excuse you give your girlfriend
>>
>
> no, the excuse i gave her was "but i didnt aim for your eye!"
Or my favorite. "But honey, I wasn't in aisle 5."
Berto >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 10, 2007
Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 60) Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:37 am
Post subject: Re: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Erik Setzer" <kgavrin-at-gmail-dot-com> wrote in message
news:op5no3dtlgal4qcjcd6bmtu357l8oj048c@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:55:47 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
> <Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>> Someone actually told me recently I should play Dwarfs because I kept
>>> grumbling about remembering the way things used to be.
>>
>>you will never be awesome enough to play the dwarves. ever.
>
> I'm going to play them. It's just a matter of getting my dad to
> actually build the bloody things so I don't have to.
>
dwarves arent lazy. you cant play dwarves. >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
Game Forums (Home) -> Warhammer -> Warhammer 40k |
All times are: Ekaterinburg, Islamabad, Karachi, Tashkent (change)
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
|
| Page 4 of 10 |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
