[40k] 5th Ed soon to be released?

"Doctor Rock" <malafex.DeleteThis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xq2ij.178941$cJ3.120691@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Myrmidon" <imnot.DeleteThis@home.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21f1e6e2b7cd948098ac49@news-server.woh.rr.com...
>
>> Damn - where's Andy Chambers when you need him?
>
> california.
>
> inevitably.
Making World of Warcrack more addictive......
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:QYmdnVm1rIFyRxXanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>dark eldar are supposed to be sinister and scary to your average guardsman
>>or guardian, right?
>
>
> depends...my guardmen hold them down and take turns punching them in the
> kidneys before making them dress like women and use coolaid for lipstick.
>
> ...its lonely on the war front and eldar look enough like women that you
> can squint and pretend.
>

Ummm Eldar, 'making' them wear dresses, thats a bit like making Erik be Dumb
or Blackie be an arsewipe.

Show an elder a frock and they are in it before you can say pansy.
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

"estarriol" <estarriol.DeleteThis@estarriol.jeansNTshirt.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fmans0$ktl$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
>
> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:QYmdnVm1rIFyRxXanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>dark eldar are supposed to be sinister and scary to your average
>>>guardsman or guardian, right?
>>
>>
>> depends...my guardmen hold them down and take turns punching them in the
>> kidneys before making them dress like women and use coolaid for lipstick.
>>
>> ...its lonely on the war front and eldar look enough like women that you
>> can squint and pretend.
>>
>
> Ummm Eldar, 'making' them wear dresses, thats a bit like making Erik be
> Dumb or Blackie be an arsewipe.
>
> Show an elder a frock and they are in it before you can say pansy.

of all the races of 40k
my least favorite race is the eldar
id rather have lunch with a fat ogryn
than to spend one moment with an elf

id rather take a slam to my head
than to toast to an eldars health
they're tall and ugly and much too skinny
and of this you must be sure
that eldar are the sickliest thing around
and of that there is no cure

oh stay away from those crooked elves
they look like women and they smell like hell
so if youll take my sound advice
keep a distance of at least ten feet!

id rather go fishing with abbadon the depoiler
than to go fishing with an eldar
id rather go swiming with a necron
than to go bobbing with an ugly eldar

their voices are fem and they dont look like men
and their bodies are devoid of hair
now im sure you can understand
why they give me such a scare

oh stay away from those crooked elves
they look like women and they smell like hell
so if youll take my sound advice
keep a distance of at least ten feet!

against my better judgement
i once went fishing with an eldar
he stole my smores and dented my pots
and made the cabin smell

of lavender and rose buds
what nasty smells they be
so i went and threw him into the lake and
then i went and had some tea

oh stay away from those crooked elves
they look like women and they smell like hell
so if youll take my sound advice
keep a distance of at least ten feet!
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:dJidnRdKT_0RUBXanZ2dnUVZ_oCvnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>8. Vehicles without a WS in CC always get hit in the rear armour.
>>
>> Cool. That should help eliminate whining about where my Tankbustas
>> charge the vehicle.
>>
>
> and why do things always have to be in me when gw make rules?

are you sure it's not just coincidence?

>>>12. Only non vehicle non swarm troop choices are scoring units (Note I
>>>did not say infantry)
>>
>> This I like. I hate swarms and TMCs holding objectives.
>
> wtf cant they?

I didn't read this as stating that MCs can't hold objectives. swarms, for
obvious reasons (it only takes someone with big enough boots to stomp on
them)

>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>
>> Hmm again...
>
> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will never
> get it right.

I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

Doctor Rock wrote:

> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either

But if you did would you be clitorious?
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

It was twenty years ago today, Doctor Rock taught the band to play:
> "Kurt" <kolonelk.DeleteThis@gnospammail.com> wrote in message
>>>> Can't say I'm that fussed over them either way, I'd like to see
>>>> something a little more interesting done to most of that range.
>>> The entire Necron range needs to be a lot more interesting. Its as
>>> boring as the Chaos v4 codex, and that's saying something.
>>>
>> It's a pretty limited concept to work with. Space skeletons!
>
> seriously. why don't they just go ahead and make a limited edition Superted
> figure while they're at it?
>
Because that might actually be cool? But only if it comes with Spotty.

--
Kurt *Kill the nospam to reply*

Ignoring the fluff is like sleeping with your cousin!

-- RGMW outtake
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

>
>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>
>>> Hmm again...
>>
>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>> never get it right.
>
> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either

poor guy.
>
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

>
>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>
>>> Hmm again...
>>
>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>> never get it right.
>
> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either

in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep when i
wrote it.
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

On 1/12/08 3:53 PM, in article lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d.DeleteThis@comcast.com,
"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:

>>
>>>>> 13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm again...
>>>
>>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
>>> never get it right.
>>
>> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
>
> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep when i
> wrote it.
>
Which just proves spell check was programmed by a man <grin>
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:24:11 -0500, "The Cheshire Cat"
<Roknese.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>6. Close combat rules amended with a combat resolution phase similar
>>>to fantasy
>>
>> Yay, my Orks are more dangerous in big mobz!
>
>wait. basically, what youre saying is this is returning us to the days when
>one single dark eldar leader can zoom over to the end of a 10 man firing
>line and kill everyone in one turn again.
>
>wonderful.

I doubt it, you can't things like that in WFB any more.


>>>7. Single vehicle damage table.
>>
>> Simplified vehicle damage... not sure on that. (Looks at old
>> datafax.) Then again...
>
>eh. theyll never get vehicles right.

But we can hope for less wrong.


>>>8. Vehicles without a WS in CC always get hit in the rear armour.
>>
>> Cool. That should help eliminate whining about where my Tankbustas
>> charge the vehicle.
>
>and why do things always have to be in me when gw make rules?

Because all our opinions are based on how the rules affect us - our
favorite army, our style of play. Gamers are selfish by nature. Who
cares if the Eldar are screwed? As long as they leave my armies
alone, I'm a happy man.


>>>9. Vehicles able to ram
>>
>> Finally! About bloody time that's back.
>
>agreed

Granted, Orks get this in the new codex if you buy the kit to do so...
that'll be odd if this is true.


>>>10. Other vehicle amendments
>>
>> Hmm...
>
>slaneeshian vibrocannon anyone?

No, that's more like a pleasurable "Mmmmmmm....."

Wait, that's not the right response, is it?


>>>11. Mission rules changed in a similar manner to Apocalypse (no more
>>>Alpha, Gamma or Omega).
>>
>> Not sure I like this so much. Too simple will cause a problem.
>
>well remember what happened with 3rd edition?

All too well.


> i smell a repeat.

That's just your litter box.


>>>12. Only non vehicle non swarm troop choices are scoring units (Note I
>>>did not say infantry)
>>
>> This I like. I hate swarms and TMCs holding objectives.
>
>wtf cant they?

Eh, it just strikes me as funky. Vehicles, too. I just think the
grunts should get more love in 40K.


>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>
>> Hmm again...
>
>much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will never
>get it right.

Wonderful, just what I need, the thought of Gav Thorpe authoring a
GW-branded Kama Sutra.


>>>Overall the ruleset hasn't changed dramatically but areas have been
>>>clarified, streamlined and in some cases brought closer to 2nd
>>>edition.
>>>
>>>+++
>>>
>>>I worry whenever GW proclaims its intent to "streamline" something.
>>>Especially when I see the term in the same sentence as "2nd Ed".
>
>i loved second edition. just needed some fixing but it was better than the
>rest of the rules combined.

Yep, it had flair. Iron out the quirks and it would be so awesome.

But then, it didn't sell as many figures as the new edition.

--
Erik

Insert soulless sig file here.
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

"The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >
> in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep when
> i wrote it.
Hey, its clitorUS not clitorME. Stop being so damn self-centered.
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

"Erik Setzer" wrote
> "The Cheshire Cat" wrote:

>>>>13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
>>>
>>> Hmm again...
>>
>>much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will never
>>get it right.
>
> Wonderful, just what I need, the thought of Gav Thorpe authoring a
> GW-branded Kama Sutra.

There's room in there for a line about xtra spiky bitz, but I ain't touchin'
it.

--
- Ward
wardcb at earthlink dot net

Q: What did the clock say to the Leaning Tower of Pisa?
A: "If you've got the inclination, I've got the time."
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released? 

In article <C3AEC6DB.321F%j_quick@comcast.net>, j_quick RemoveThis @comcast.net
says...
> On 1/12/08 3:53 PM, in article lsGdnV4xOIiczhTanZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d RemoveThis @comcast.com,
> "The Cheshire Cat" <Roknese RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>>> 13. Vehicles types are adjusted (the rumoured skimmer nerf)
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmm again...
> >>>
> >>> much like when they are in bed trying to find the clitorous, gw will
> >>> never get it right.
> >>
> >> I gotta say i've never found a "clitorous" either
> >
> > in my defense, spell check didnt find that and i was half dead asleep when i
> > wrote it.
> >
> Which just proves spell check was programmed by a man <grin>
>
Or that Chess has a male computer - in any case it can't find the
clitoris either...

Man discovers orgasm 4500 BC - woman discovers orgasm somewhere 1978.

Myr

--
I've only been back in the hobby for four months!!
After this thread, I might just go back to dating!!!!!

- Doc Oakenrod


RGMW FAQ: http://www.rgmw.org
 >> Stay informed about: [40k] 5th Ed soon to be released?